Search for: "Joseph v. Joseph" Results 521 - 540 of 6,731
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Oct 2010, 2:37 am by sally
High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Joseph Fielding Properties (Blackpool) Ltd v Aviva Insurance Ltd. [2010] EWHC 2192 (QB) (23 August 2010) High Court (Administrative Court) Shah, R (on the application of) v National Health Service Litigation & Ors [2010] EWHC 2575 (Admin) (15 October 2010) High Court (Commercial Court) Gesner Investments Ltd v Bombardier Inc [2010] EWHC 2643 (Comm) (22 October 2010) Source: www.bailii.org [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 9:50 pm by Patent Docs
By Joseph Herndon -- On February 10, 2016, the Federal Circuit issued a nonprecedential opinion in a case captioned Driessen v. [read post]
20 Dec 2014, 4:43 am
Patents: Les Laboratoires Servier and another v Apotex Inc and others [2014] UKSC 55, [2014] 3 WLR 1257, [2014] WLR(D) 452, [2014] BUS LR 1217, UK Supreme Court In Everet v. [read post]
18 Apr 2018, 4:51 am by Michael Stevens
 In Commonwealth of Kentucky  Cab. for Health and Family Services v Estate of Madisyn Davis, the Board of Claims dismissed appeal for failure to include indispensable party;  In Estate of Joseph Gilliam v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 6:01 am by Josh Blackman
Justice Joseph Bradley graduated from Rutgers University in 1836. [read post]
31 Aug 2009, 12:58 pm
Matter of Joseph Anayati v Board of Zoning Appeals of Town of North Hempstead In this Article 78 case, petitioners sought to review a determination of the Board of Zoning Appeals (hereinafter BZA) of the Town of North Hempstead dismissing their application for area variances. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 11:08 am by WISCONSIN LAW JOURNAL STAFF
Civil Procedure Judicial estoppel Joseph LaPere appeals an order implicitly denying his petition to return $1,150 seized by police during a search of LaPere’s property. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 9:59 pm by Patent Docs
Be Wary of Claim Amendments During Reexamination By Joseph Herndon -- Traditional patent law holds that a patentee of a patent that survives reexamination is only entitled to infringement damages for the time period between the date of issuance of the original claims and the date of issuance of the reexamined claims if the original and the reexamined claims are "substantially identical. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 9:06 pm by Patent Docs
CBM Petition Denied for Patent Lacking Financial Product or Financial Activity in the Claims By Joseph Herndon -- In a recent decision, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) denied the institution of a covered business method (CBM) patent review on an Internet Portal System patent because the claims lacked any recitation of a financial product or financial activity. [read post]