Search for: "K. K. B., In re" Results 521 - 540 of 2,379
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2011, 5:47 pm
inde de, hüküm bütün cezai sonuçlar? [read post]
26 May 2015, 5:32 am by Jerry Kalish
The recent Department of Labor’s re-proposed Fiduciary Rule has generated many opinions on how it will affect fiduciary service models. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:54 am
Wickman, Soldiers of the Spirit, Clark Memorandum 2 (Fall 1995) (here)   Marlin K. [read post]
17 Mar 2008, 7:54 am by Wayne
Wickman, Soldiers of the Spirit, Clark Memorandum 2 (Fall 1995) (here)   Marlin K. [read post]
29 Apr 2012, 5:01 pm by Oliver
(b) The EBA did not expressly say (and did not need to say) whether there might be other relevant types of substantive rights. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 3:00 am by Liz Dunshee
Here are some highlights from the 251-page adopting release – and except as noted below, the rules become effective 30 days after their publication in the Federal Register: – Item 303 and Form 20-F will allow companies to exclude discussion of the earliest of three years in the MD&A if they’ve already included the discussion in a prior filing – Item 601(b)(2) and (10) will allow companies to omit confidential information in exhibits without submitting a CTR, so… [read post]
9 Jun 2015, 8:25 pm by Harry Cole
If you’re a full-power or Class A TV station, you should take a careful look at the eligibility list to see if you’re on it. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Re (b):[2.3] The second point raised by the appellant is that it was denied the right to be heard (cf. [read post]
21 Oct 2010, 3:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
The ground of opposition (A 100(b)) had been substantiated in the notice of opposition and was not maintained by the sole opponent, who had made a corresponding declaration during the OPs before the OD, but the OD had not dealt with (abordé) this ground in its decision, and consequently the Board – following opinion G 10/91 – had considered that the re-introduction of said ground during the appeal proceedings constituted “a fresh ground of opposition”… [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 7:11 am by David Vasella
Die Vergabe war gestützt auf VöB 13 I c freihändig erfolgt, dh mangels technisch valabler Alternativen. [read post]
12 May 2010, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
[7.1] The meaning to be assigned to the key term “different decisions” as this expression is used in A 112(1)(b) must initially be determined on the basis of the provision’s wording in all official versions of the EPC, these all having equal status (A 177(1)). [read post]
16 Mar 2010, 7:13 am
Madde 5 1(b) hükmüne göre; bir mahkeme taraf? [read post]