Search for: "Kay v. Kay"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,007
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Dec 2013, 8:51 am
In 1993, this practice led to the Utah Supreme Court ruling in East Jordan Irrigation Company v Morgan, commonly known as "the East Jordan Case." [read post]
10 Jun 2010, 8:56 am
The Court, which comprised Lord Neuberger, Master of the Rolls, Lord Justice Maurice Kay, Vice President of the Court of Appeal (Civil Division) and Lord Justice Sedley, gave Fiddes permission but then went on to refuse the substantive appeal. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:45 pm
Maurice Kay LJ considered that the case-law showed two distinct approaches: the application of the Hardial Singh principles and the causation/materiality test. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 9:58 pm
(Paragraph 31) Lord Justice Patten and Lord Justice Maurice Kay agreed. [read post]
11 Nov 2013, 11:05 am
See Kay Berry, Inc. v. [read post]
3 Mar 2020, 6:40 pm
” Kate Smith of CBS News reports that “Roe v. [read post]
11 Jun 2010, 8:36 am
STEPHANIE KAY LANNINGon writ of certiorari to the united states court of appeals for the tenth circuit[June 7, 2010] Justice Alito delivered the opinion of the Court. [read post]
11 Nov 2007, 10:11 am
OpinionShort Title/District 07a0433p.06 Morgan v. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
The importance of national precedent in such situations, per Lord Bingham in Kay v LB Lambeth [2006] UKHL 10, was crucial. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:52 pm
The importance of national precedent in such situations, per Lord Bingham in Kay v LB Lambeth [2006] UKHL 10, was crucial. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 9:59 am
Kay, No. 01-cr-914 (S.D. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 12:47 am
" "Yipeee kai aaaa mother f'er. [read post]
6 Feb 2009, 7:17 pm
Auth. v. [read post]
12 May 2012, 4:51 am
On 1 February 2012 the Court (Lord Judge, Lord Neuberger and Maurice Kay LJ) unanimously upheld the ruling of Mann J that, as a result of the operation of section 72 of the Senior Courts Act 1981, Mr Mulcaire was not entitled to rely on PSI ([2012] EWCA Civ 48). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
26 Jul 2018, 4:19 am
” In the Penn Program on Regulation’s Regulatory Review, Eric Fikry explains why last term’s decision in Murphy v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 10:50 am
Kay, PC, 650 F.3d 993 (3d Cir. 2011) Id, at 1003 N.J. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:25 am
In the case of Pui Kwan Kay v Ming Pao Holdings [2015] HKCA 540 the Court of Appeal allowed the defendant’s appeal in a libel case brought by the vice-chairman of the Hong Kong Football Association after the Court of Appeal ruled the paper made its comments in the public interest. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 10:30 pm
It was argued on behalf of the claimants that this was an error, but as the Maurice Kay LJ pointed out, they were unable to identify any domestic or Strasbourg authority to support their position. [read post]
