Search for: "Kay v. Kay"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,011
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 May 2012, 4:00 am
Both Maurice Kay LJ, Justice Tomlinson LJ agreed with Hooper LJ and dismissed the appeal. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am
Coomber heard 9 and 16 November 2011 (HHJ Moloney QC) El-Naschie v Macmillan, heard 11, 14, 16 to 18, 21, 22, 25, 28-30 November, 1 -2 December 2011 (Sharp J) Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Chambers v DPP, heard 8 February 2012 (Gross LJ and Irwin J) Qema v NGN Ltd heard 29 February and 1 March 2012 (Sharp J) Hunt v Times Newspapers, heard 9 and 12 March 2012 (Eady J) Bento v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire, heard 3… [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 3:46 pm
Similarly, in Romano v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:33 pm
Kay, 197 Md. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 12:33 pm
Kay, 197 Md. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 5:00 am
Workplace retaliation was the last thing on the mind of Cobra Kai Sensei John Kreese when he told Johnny to sweep the leg. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 6:38 pm
Nanette Kay Laughrey Click here to read the decision, Pettet v. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 3:04 am
The full list of resolved complaints from last week: Mr Peter Reynolds v The Mail on Sunday, Clause 1, 20/04/2012; Samaritans, Mind, Rethink Mental Illness, Sane and PAPYRUS Prevention of Young Suicide v The Sun, Clause 5, 19/04/2012; Mr Adam Stephens v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mr Peter Reynolds v Harborough Mail, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; Mrs Drene Brown v Scunthorpe Telegraph, Clause 1, 19/04/2012; A woman v Hastings and St Leonards… [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 2:15 pm
Day of Rage, Kai Wargalla, and the Hon. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 9:43 am
Finally, on 3 April 2012, the Court of Appeal (Maurice Kay and Hooper LJJ and Henderson J) dismissed the appeal by the defendant in the case of Bento v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire. [read post]
31 Mar 2012, 1:46 pm
Read the lawsuit here: Kai Stumpf v. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 10:54 am
Maurice Kay LJ considered that in some of the cases, Article 8 may be engaged although he rejected the engagement of Article 3 in all the cases. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 2:51 pm
(1) (a) A witness who refuses, or is likely to refuse, on the basis of his privilege against self-incrimination to testify or provide evidence or information in a criminal investigation, including a grand jury investigation or prosecution of a criminal case, or in aid of an investigation or inquiry being conducted by a government agency or commission, or by either house of the Legislature, a joint committee of the two houses, or a committee or subcommittee of either house may be compelled to… [read post]
26 Mar 2012, 6:21 am
However, as we will see with the recent case of Taylor v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am
Corby BC v Scott & West Kent Housing Association v Haycraft [2012] EWCA Civ 276 are the first cases that have required the Court of Appeal to consider and apply the guidance given in Powell v Hounslow LBC [2011] UKSC 8 & Pinnock v Manchester CC [2010] UKSC 45 (our notes here & here). [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 9:38 pm
Hopefully the decision of His Honour Judge Kay QC in Lloyd Fraser (Ply Chain) v Hutton (click for judgment) (13/9/11, Luton County Court) will help to reduce the scope for any argument on this subject. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 8:13 am
In December 1833, the American Monthly Review commented on a newly published book by Joseph Story. [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:24 am
In Fred Perry (Holdings) Ltd v Brands Plaza Trading Ltd and another [2012] EWCA Civ 224 (Lords Justices Maurice Kay, Jackson and Lewison) the Court of Appeal for England and Wales provided some more than useful guidance on the application of one of the Civil Procedure Rules -- CPR 3.9, which deals with relief from the striking out of a claim and, indeed, other sanctions). [read post]
