Search for: "Kerr v. State" Results 521 - 540 of 1,523
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am by UKSC Live Blogging
  1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]
15 May 2019, 2:57 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
Also dissenting, Lord Kerr held that the manifestly without reasonable foundation test should not be imported into the national court’s consideration of a measure’s proportionality. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:30 pm by Orin Kerr
(Orin Kerr) In a recently-filed amicus brief submitted by Oracle America Inc. before the en banc Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:48 am by Alice Himsworth, Olswang.
The case was heard in April by the Supreme Court Justices Lord Hope, Lord Kerr, Lord Clarke, Lord Dyson and Lord Reed. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 4:56 pm
"An "agency" is each board, commission, department, officer, division, or other administrative office or unit of the state government "authorized by law to make rules and regulations. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm by INFORRM
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 3:19 pm by Kent Scheidegger
The US Solicitor General has petitioned for certiorari in United States v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:55 am by Kali Borkoski
This morning the Court issued its decision in the GPS tracking case United States v. [read post]
17 Dec 2024, 2:21 pm by Orin S. Kerr
Here's some remarkable testimony from the suppression hearing in State v. [read post]
29 May 2008, 3:52 pm
If Orin Kerr is right that Missouri's hypothetical adoption of such a statute could inform court opinion, what should the court make of two states, Alabama and Missouri, failing to pass such statutes. [read post]
22 Feb 2011, 6:55 am by Kiran Bhat
Briefly: At the Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr explains why the Chief Justice’s willingness to assign the opinion in United States v. [read post]