Search for: "Kerr v. State"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,614
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jun 2007, 8:40 am
Orin Kerr's entry on the decision here. [read post]
31 Jul 2014, 7:54 am
Although a few specialized statutes (like the FECA provision at issue in California Medical) provide for certification, the three most common examples of certifications by federal courts are: (1) certifications of questions of state law to state courts of last resort (which is irrelevant for present purposes, since Article III doesn’t bind state courts); (2) certifications of otherwise unappealable interlocutory questions under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
18 Oct 2010, 10:37 pm
(Orin Kerr) Today Justice Sotomayor authored what strikes me as a rather remarkable dissent from denial of certiorari in Pitre v. [read post]
27 Apr 2007, 8:17 am
[POL roundup; Santa Clara v. [read post]
24 Oct 2024, 7:09 pm
Back in August, I had two very long posts about the Fifth Circuit's remarkable decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2010, 8:45 pm
The case, McKenna v. [read post]
20 Apr 2008, 10:36 am
Lopez and United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 7:32 am
The post More Perspectives About Van Buren v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 10:02 am
A concurrence by Justice Sotomayor in United States v. [read post]
4 Feb 2015, 2:07 am
On 24 and 25 November 2014, the Supreme Court heard the case of R (Evans) v Her Majesty’s Attorney-General. [read post]
24 Dec 2010, 8:41 am
See Morales-Martinez, 496 F.3d at 358–61; accord United States v. [read post]
27 Mar 2007, 6:46 am
[mailto:m.ledford3@ledfordlaw.net] Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2007 1:11 AMTo: Thomas McCarten Kerr, EsqCc: Barry MerchantSubject: Sony BMG et al. v. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:54 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 9:43 pm
In People v. [read post]
30 Jan 2019, 2:48 am
Lord Kerr gave a separate judgment, disagreeing with the majority’s approach to the legality test and its application of the proportionality test. [read post]
21 May 2007, 12:05 pm
Los Angeles County v. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 1:18 am
1538: Aidan O’Neill QC submits that the role of this court is to rebalance the constitution. 1530: Aidan O’Neill QC refers to the decision in Padfield v Minister of Agriculture at page 1061 of the decision. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 3:30 pm
(Orin Kerr) In a recently-filed amicus brief submitted by Oracle America Inc. before the en banc Ninth Circuit in United States v. [read post]
15 May 2019, 2:57 am
Also dissenting, Lord Kerr held that the manifestly without reasonable foundation test should not be imported into the national court’s consideration of a measure’s proportionality. [read post]
11 Nov 2018, 8:02 pm
Butt v Secretary of State for the Home Department, heard 17 October 2018 (Underhill [read post]
