Search for: "Lacking v. State of Mississippi" Results 521 - 540 of 620
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Complaint (2013): Conditions in East Mississippi Correctional Facility are "barbaric. [read post]
25 Jun 2023, 10:54 am by Eugene Volokh
"[16] But Claiborne Hardware had no occasion to decide whether a person's not dealing with someone based on that someone's race was itself protected by the First Amendment, because it was clear that Mississippi law did not prohibit such private choices not to deal.[17] Under Mississippi law, whites could generally refuse to deal with blacks, and blacks could refuse to deal with whites. [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
24 Jun 2016, 10:18 am by John Elwood
Mississippi, 14-10486, and Floyd v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:35 am by Marie Louise
(IPBiz)   US Patents – Decisions CAFC reverses DNH in Markem-Imaje Corporation v Zipher; Newman partially dissents (IPBiz) District Court Nevada: Plaintiff need not produce licenses involving unasserted patents where licenses involving patents-in-suit have been produced: Bally Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Sep 2007, 2:47 am
Wilder, No. 06-60711 In a to 42 U.S.C. section 1983 suit against the Mississippi Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, and Parks and two of its employees, dismissal of claims against one defendant is affirmed where defendant was entitled to qualified immunity because his actions, in the form of pressuring and assisting plaintiff in committing a charged crime, even to the extent that they constituted entrapment under state law, did not by themselves constitute a violation of a… [read post]
24 Feb 2020, 10:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Murder case on Tinder, which was v. helpful. [read post]
27 Jul 2007, 4:00 pm
Could be, although one would think State Farm had some idea of what the documents said, especially since Scruggs had previously used some of them as exhibits in the complaint in the McIntosh v. [read post]