Search for: "Lamb v. Lamb" Results 521 - 540 of 545
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Oct 2007, 12:00 pm
VC Lamb, in Conrad, cited favorably the use of statistical data, relying on the court's reasoning in Ryan v. [read post]
27 Sep 2007, 1:11 am
The justices have already agreed to hear a similar case, Riegel v. [read post]
20 Jul 2007, 2:31 am
Court of  Appeal (Civil Division)   Nichia Corp v Argos Ltd [2007] EWCA Civ 741 (19 July 2007) Avis v Turner & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 748 (19 July 2007) AWB (Geneva) SA & Anor v North America Steamships Ltd & Anor [2007] EWCA Civ 739 (18 July 2007) Bibi & Ors v Entry Clearance Officer, Dhaka [2007] EWCA Civ 740 (18 July 2007) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) Kelly & Anor v R. [2007] EWCA… [read post]
16 Jul 2007, 5:13 pm
” Besides being a trademark (not a copyright) dispute, and the fact the jury awarded damages (not a fine), the article actually wasn’t that bad.The case cite is Cache La Poudre Feed, LLC v. [read post]
31 May 2007, 6:11 am
Court Grants Drug Company's Motion To Set Aside Philadelphia Jury Verdict In Nelson v. [read post]
30 May 2007, 10:22 am
Jury Awards $2.6 Million For Inflammatory Bowel Disease Side Effect (Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com) On May 29, 2007 a New Jersey state court jury handed down a $2.619 million verdict against pharmaceutical company Hoffman-La Roche Inc. for the failure to warn that its acne drug Accutane can cause inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), as alleged in the Complaint for the lawsuit Andrew McCarrell v. [read post]
16 May 2007, 10:34 am
Plaintiff Simon Developed Breast Cancer After Using HRT Drugs Prempro, Premarin, And Provera (Posted by Tom Lamb at DrugInjuryWatch.com) On May 15, 2007 a Pennsylvania state court jury handed down a mixed verdict in the latest hormone replacement therapy (HRT) products liability case to go to trial, Simon v. [read post]
6 Mar 2007, 4:19 am
Green - Vice Chancellor Stephen Lamb granted a motion to expedite, finding that the complaint... [read post]
12 Feb 2007, 4:52 am
The Court agreed, noting that the skimpy record below gave little reason to overturn the judge's decision below in denying the TRO, given the petitioner's burden to prove 1) the likelihood that the petitioner would succeed on the merits, 2) the 'balance of inconvenience' between granting or denying the TRO, 3) the petitioner would suffer irreparable injury, and 4) the public interest.The Court also rejected the petitioner's argument that Lamb v. [read post]
2 Feb 2007, 5:48 pm
Cord, USMCDetailed Military Defense Counsel, Major Jeffrey V. [read post]