Search for: "Leisure v. Leisure" Results 521 - 540 of 672
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Jun 2012, 9:29 am by J
It contained over 1200 flats, together with leisure facilities. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:29 am by J
It contained over 1200 flats, together with leisure facilities. [read post]
28 Oct 2011, 2:26 am by Marie Louise
– practical ramifications of ECJ’s decision in MPS v Murphy and FAPL v QC Leisure (1709 Copyright Blog) Levies for private copying when blank media are imported: who pays? [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:33 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
After all, the Captain and Tennille and leisure suits made sense in 1980 to some people. [read post]
31 Mar 2021, 9:03 pm by Sarah Roubidoux Lawson
Supreme Court issued its opinion in McGirt v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 10:35 am
 ; subject to anything the Court of Justice might say to the contrary in its keenly-awaited ruling in Football Association Premier League v QC Leisure [Advocate General's Opinion this February noted briefly here, with links], TVC had reproduced a substantial part of the films in its buffers (which could in theory hold up to 8 seconds worth of video streaming) and on screen;  provisionally, the reproduction in the buffers and on the screens was not a… [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 10:21 am
There's a provocative piece on the jiplp weblog, "Premier League v QC Leisure: an opinion about an opinion -- what's your opinion? [read post]
29 Dec 2010, 12:33 pm by Daniel E. Cummins
After all, the Captain and Tennille and leisure suits made sense in 1980 to some people. [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 7:19 pm
Whether child will receive educational, health and leisure opportunities at least equal to what is available here. 5. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 12:06 pm by David Walk
After all, the Captain and Tennille and leisure suits made sense in 1980 to some people. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 10:49 pm by Frances Drummond (AU)
 The reasoning in cases such as Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Sport Leisure Pty Ltd (2012) 202 FCR 286 and Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Ltd (2012) 294 ALR 72 no longer apply and organisations will potentially need to reconsider their ownership arrangements in Australia. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:48 am
 There's also a neat Current Intelligence note by the perceptive Enrico Bonadio (City Law School, London) on the Advocate General's Opinion on what counts as "communication to the public" in the joined cases of Football Association Premier League v QC Leisure, YouTube and Karen Murphy v Media Protection Services Ltd (Joined Cases C-403/08 and C-429/08), which the Court of Justice is going to decide this summer. [read post]
5 Apr 2018, 10:49 pm by Frances Drummond (AU)
 The reasoning in cases such as Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Sport Leisure Pty Ltd (2012) 202 FCR 286 and Paul’s Retail Pty Ltd v Lonsdale Australia Ltd (2012) 294 ALR 72 no longer apply and organisations will potentially need to reconsider their ownership arrangements in Australia. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 6:26 pm by Steve Bainbridge
I was reminded of all this by Francis Pileggi's post on a recent Delaware case, Hampshire Group, Limited v. [read post]