Search for: "Liable Defendant(s)"
Results 521 - 540
of 21,025
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Jun 2011, 9:24 am
" In summary, under the Court's Global Tech decision, one may be liable for inducing infringement if he knew that the acts induced constitute an infringement. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 7:37 am
Applying the court’s overbroad standard, GoDaddy is a domain name registrar and didn’t have the requisite bad faith intent to profit to satisfy the ACPA, so it isn’t liable under the Lanham Act. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:09 am
He found the Defendant liable, awarding damages of £90,000, and the additional remedy of an injunction. [read post]
31 Dec 2016, 8:29 am
This judgment (not yet on Bailii) concerns Jaguar's application for summary judgment and Bombardier's application to amend its Defence and add a counterclaim.Although the summary judgment claim was for infringement, Bombardier accepted that unless it could partially revoke the mark it did not have a defence to the double identity claim. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 2:46 pm
On appeal, the Supreme Court of Utah adopted the restatement rule and reversed the district court’s order denying summary judgment and held that children under the age of five may not be held liable for negligence. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 3:25 pm
The Plaintiff's claim for damages resulting from a motor vehicle accident was dismissed where the Court held that the Defendant was not liable for his vehicle sliding on an unexpected patch of ice on a bridge. [read post]
21 Jul 2016, 12:21 pm
The most recent appellate opinion ruled that the plaintiff had no claim as a matter of law, and the defendant cannot be held liable for the boy’s death. [read post]
1 Dec 2019, 8:49 am
The post CreateSpace Isn’t Liable for Publishing Allegedly Infringing Uploaded Book–King v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 8:01 am
Ultimately, the court concluded that the defendant was not liable based on his reaction to another driver’s road-rage induced erratic driving. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 8:01 am
Ultimately, the court concluded that the defendant was not liable based on his reaction to another driver’s road-rage induced erratic driving. [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 12:30 am
Harris County named both of James's sons as defendants "in rem only" and stated that it did not seek a personal judgment against any defendant identified as "in rem only. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 10:00 pm
The United States Supreme Court held on June 1 that the False Claims Act’s (FCA) scienter element requires analysis of the defendant’s subjective intent at the time of the alleged false claim, and that a defendant can be liable even if the underlying statute or rule is ambiguous and can be reasonably interpreted to allow the defendant’s conduct. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 10:00 pm
The United States Supreme Court held on June 1 that the False Claims Act’s (FCA) scienter element requires analysis of the defendant’s subjective intent at the time of the alleged false claim, and that a defendant can be liable even if the underlying statute or rule is ambiguous and can be reasonably interpreted to allow the defendant’s conduct. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 10:00 pm
The United States Supreme Court held on June 1 that the False Claims Act’s (FCA) scienter element requires analysis of the defendant’s subjective intent at the time of the alleged false claim, and that a defendant can be liable even if the underlying statute or rule is ambiguous and can be reasonably interpreted to allow the defendant’s conduct. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 10:00 pm
The United States Supreme Court held on June 1 that the False Claims Act’s (FCA) scienter element requires analysis of the defendant’s subjective intent at the time of the alleged false claim, and that a defendant can be liable even if the underlying statute or rule is ambiguous and can be reasonably interpreted to allow the defendant’s conduct. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 10:00 pm
The United States Supreme Court held on June 1 that the False Claims Act’s (FCA) scienter element requires analysis of the defendant’s subjective intent at the time of the alleged false claim, and that a defendant can be liable even if the underlying statute or rule is ambiguous and can be reasonably interpreted to allow the defendant’s conduct. [read post]
1 Jun 2023, 10:00 pm
The United States Supreme Court held on June 1 that the False Claims Act’s (FCA) scienter element requires analysis of the defendant’s subjective intent at the time of the alleged false claim, and that a defendant can be liable even if the underlying statute or rule is ambiguous and can be reasonably interpreted to allow the defendant’s conduct. [read post]
22 Sep 2017, 7:46 am
However, ultimately, it is the plaintiff’s job to thoroughly investigate their claim and name all potentially liable defendants at the outset. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 1:57 pm
If a dangerous condition or defect exists that the restaurant is aware of, the restaurant will be liable for any reasonably foreseeable injuries. [read post]
5 Jan 2017, 10:46 am
This might not seem like that severe a punishment for actions that have led to the deaths of 4 children, but that’s what the law says. [read post]
