Search for: "Lloyd v. State" Results 521 - 540 of 1,487
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Sep 2018, 2:27 am by INFORRM
  A copy of the judgment can be found here [pdf] Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings in media law cases are outstanding: Economou v Freitas, heard 17 and 18 April 2018 (Lewison, Ryder and Sharp LJJ) Lloyd v Google LLC, heard 21 to 23 May 2018 (Warby J) Monir v Wood, heard 16 to 19 April and 3 to 5 July 2018 (Nicklin J). [read post]
3 Sep 2018, 8:24 am by JEMIMA LOVATT
The case was heard before Lord Kerr, Lord Reed, Lord Hughes, Lady Black and Lord Lloyd-Jones on 18 Oct 2017. [read post]
13 Aug 2018, 12:22 pm by J
Whilst it goes too far to say that a CFA could never be allowed, the decision in R v (Factortame Ltd) v Secretary of State for Transport, Local Government and the Regions (No.8) [2003] QB 381 suggested that, at the very least, it should be flagged up early in the proceedings as it may go to admissibility. [read post]
29 Jul 2018, 4:50 pm by INFORRM
United States The Washington Times reports that a judge has ordered a deposition by Fusion GPS in the libel case brought by Aleksej Gubarev against Buzzfeed. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 7:06 am by CECILY WHITE
The Supreme Court (Lord Lloyd-Jones, with whom Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Kerr and Lord Wilson agreed) unanimously allowed the Commissioner’s appeal. [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
R (Hallam) v Secretary of State for Justice; R (Nealon) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 8-9 May 2018. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
Surveillance Privacy International has released a report: “Teach ‘em to Phish: State Sponsors of Surveillance” reviewing the approaches of governments to providing surveillance equipment to other countries. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am by ASAD KHAN
“Precarious” was not, in their Lordships’ view, “a term of art” and was similar but not identical to the guidance imparted in Jeunesse v Netherlands (2015) 60 EHRR 17 whereby family life was rendered precarious from the outset where those “involved were aware that the immigration status of one of them was such that the persistence of that family life within the host state would from the outset be precarious. [read post]