Search for: "Long Term Capital Holdings v. United States"
Results 521 - 540
of 644
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2011, 6:42 am
This past Term’s Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
The modified approach outlined in this Article promises to strike a better balance between investor protections and national sovereignty, and thereby promote the long-term viability o [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 7:01 am
The modified approach outlined in this Article promises to strike a better balance between investor protections and national sovereignty, and thereby promote the long-term viability of investment treaty arbitration. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:34 am
United States, 10-7515, for United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 11:37 pm
“G.A.P Adventures shall have until September 1, 2011, to transition to a new name in the United States,” the June 24, 2011 federal court order states. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 5:12 pm
The defendants affected by the Court’s ruling on the statute of limitation filed a petition for a writ of certiorari with the United States Supreme Court and on June 27, 2011, the Court granted the petition. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm
But that’s where Janus Capital Group v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
Some states have alleged that ICSID is biased, withdrawn from the ICSID Convention, and advocated creating alternative arbitration systems. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 5:48 am
Some states have alleged that ICSID is biased, withdrawn from the ICSID Convention, and advocated creating alternative arbitration systems. [read post]
29 May 2011, 3:05 pm
As long as a professional (a lawyer, a doctor, a teacher, an engineer, anyone) makes it clear that he does not hold a license or a certain certificate, and as long as there are people willing to use his services, there is no reason why he should be prevented from offering these services. [read post]
23 May 2011, 9:34 am
United States, No. 09-5801, an equal protection challenge to the federal government’s disparate treatment of male and female U.S. citizens for purposes of establishing the citizenship of their children born overseas. [read post]
16 May 2011, 9:23 am
The 4th Circuit's ruling in U.S. v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 1:28 pm
However, Article 9 does not apply to the extent that a statute, regulation, or treaty of the United States preempts it. [read post]
4 May 2011, 11:13 am
Unless you've been living in a compound, off the grid with no internet access in a medium sized city outside the capital of a troubled nation in South Asia, you undoubtedly are aware of the Supreme Court's decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am
The Status of Religious Arbitration in the United States and Canada Nicholas Walter Abstract: This paper discusses, and challenges, the status of religious arbitration in the United States and Canada. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:00 am
Instead, he agrees with the logic and methodology approved in Matter of Murphy (United States Dredging Corp.), 74 AD3d 815 (2d Dept 2010) (read here my post on Murphy), requiring a present value computation of the gains taxes to be paid at a projected future date, here, at the end of the assumed 10-year holding period. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 9:31 am
Colonial archive v. local sites; old works v. present recordings as part of the archive; new relations of control. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 7:02 pm
The criminal case is U.S. v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm
Nor are developing countries likely to model their legal system on countries with first amendment protection, such as the United States, if the verdicts are 15 times higher than in the United Kingdom[6]. [read post]
26 Jan 2011, 12:54 am
These unlawful marketing activities were responsible for Pfizer paying the largest fine in United States history. [read post]
