Search for: "Lopez v. US Government" Results 521 - 540 of 643
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2010, 12:11 pm by Corey Rayburn Yung
I -- I notice that in -- in the government's position you don't argue the Commerce Clause very much, and I -- we have got at Morrison v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:21 am by RobKornfeld
It was great to have my client and his wife and kids in court with us. [read post]
5 Nov 2009, 12:29 pm
Union Pacific Railroad Co., 50 S.W.3d 226, 249 (Mo. 2001); Lopez v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 4:06 pm by admin
The company’s Wallingford plant contained a production line that used to manufacture resins. [read post]
12 Sep 2009, 7:00 am
Robinson, 923 S.W.2d at 553-54 & 556; see also Kelly v. [read post]
25 Aug 2009, 4:53 am by Dr. Jillian T. Weiss
When a law is alleged to violate the US Constitution, the government is required to demonstrate that the law has a proper basis as found in the powers granted to Congress by the Constitution. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 4:32 am
  For me, the controversy brings to mind the racial prerequisite cases from the early 1900s that Ian Haney Lopez has written about, such as United States v. [read post]
20 Jul 2009, 1:34 am
Occupancy Tax Last Act: 07/11/09 signed chap.9596 A3988 Crouch (MS) -- Extends authorization of the county of Delaware to impose an additional one percent of sales and compensating use taxes BLURB : Tax. [read post]
6 Jul 2009, 1:42 am
 69 S5503 SAVINO -- Provides for the compensation payable to certain members of the division of state police and professional, scientific and technical service employees; repealer BLURB : Exec. comp. state police Last Act: 06/17/09 SIGNED CHAP.6970 S5504 SAVINO -- Relates to compensation and benefits of certain members of the state police; appropriation; repealers BLURB : Exec. state police compensation Last Act: 06/17/09 SIGNED CHAP.7071… [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 11:59 am
Today's case had a panel that included Judges Pregerson and Reinhardt.Which, not coincidentally, helps explain the divergent results between not only those two cases, but also the pro-government decision reached in the other the criminal cases decided by the Ninth Circuit today and this one. [read post]