Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 521 - 540
of 3,587
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Jul 2017, 3:10 am
The appellant was named and the case name is now Khuja (formerly known as PNM) v Times Newspapers. [read post]
30 Jul 2021, 3:56 am
Access to justice The case of (UNISON) v Lord Chancellor [2017] UKSC 51; [2020] AC 869 is concerned with the lawfulness of policy which impedes an individual’s access to a court or tribunal. [read post]
10 Jun 2011, 8:45 am
The Secretary of State is obliged to follow policy absent good reason not to do so (Kambadzi per Lord Hope at §36; Lord Kerr at §85). [read post]
1 Sep 2016, 8:17 am
The arguments Appellant The appellant argued that the Court of Justice (CJEU) decision in Richards v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (C-423/04) demonstrated that the art 4 prohibition on gender discrimination extended to those who had acquired gender by later reassignment. [read post]
17 Jan 2017, 2:35 am
According to Lord Neuberger these are qualified by a public policy exception. [read post]
16 Aug 2016, 7:27 am
Lords Hughes and Toulson disagreed with the majority on this issue. [read post]
29 Jul 2015, 2:36 am
Lord Gill and Lord Neuberger also gave separate concurring judgments. [read post]
Lord Justices Floyd and Arnold disagree on the inventiveness of expandable hoses [2020] EWCA Civ 871
24 Jul 2020, 12:29 am
The difficultly inherent in the case was reflected by the disagreement between the two patent specialist judges who heard the case, Lord Justices Arnold and Floyd. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 1:27 am
Fili Shipping Co., UK House of Lords). 8) In the facts, MSM stated that the Deed was voidable at its option for false representation and fraud. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 2:07 am
Secretary of State for Work and Pensions v Payne & Anor, heard 4 November 2011. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
The House of Lords had previously thought that the scheme was lawful, in R (S) v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police [2004] 1 WLR 2196. [read post]
26 Mar 2014, 12:23 pm
(JUSTICES: Lord Hope (Deputy President), Lord Walker, Lord Kerr, Lord Reed, and Lord Carnwath) The post Joint Administrators of Heritable Bank plc (Respondent) v The Winding-Up Board of Landsbanki Islands hf (Appellant) (Scotland) [2013] UKSC 13 appeared first on UKSCBlog. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 12:21 am
Although Lord Carnwath (in line with the dissenting opinions of Lord Sales and Lady Arden) disagreed with Lord Wilson’s view that the scope of the Guidance is limited to “purely procedural or operational matters”, he stated that this did not open the door to “the delineation of the functions of central government in relation to the fund”. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 5:00 am
First-Tier Tribunal decision The First-Tier Tribunal applied the principals set out in the House of Lords decision in Customs and Excise Commissioners v Redrow Group plc [1999] UKHL 4. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 5:17 am
Robson v Robson [2010] EWCA Civ 1171 may ultimately be best remembered for the language used by Lord Justice Ward in his judgment, rather than for any particular point of law. [read post]
16 May 2011, 11:52 am
” In addressing this issue, Eady J referred to Attorney-General v Guardian Newspapers (No 2) [1990] 1 AC 109, where the House of Lords had drawn a distinction between state secrets and confidential information relating to an individual’s private life. [read post]
17 Feb 2018, 7:31 am
The use of prosecution history must support at least one of the two instances identified by Lord Neuberger in Actavis v Lilly. [read post]
10 Feb 2016, 2:28 am
Lord Reed and Lord Hodge stated that no consideration had been given to the possibility of personal protective equipment and the precautions taken, in the form of advice to wear appropriate footwear, did not specify what might be appropriate. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 5:31 am
The principle of a MIR per se is not objectionable as the Court states (see Konstantinov v Netherlands cited at para. 84) but the impact of the new threshold is surely a relevant consideration in considering compatibility. [read post]
26 Mar 2018, 1:00 am
R (Stott) v Secretary of State for Justice, heard 18 Jan 2018. [read post]
