Search for: "Lord v. State"
Results 521 - 540
of 4,035
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
In NML Capital v Argentina, the question for the Supreme Court was whether one such investor, a New York fund that bought into Argentinian bonds which were subsequently defaulted, could enforce its judgment against assets of the Argentinian state in the United Kingdom. [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 5:29 am
Jurisprudence has evolved in the UK, Germany, Netherlands and other member states. [read post]
1 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
The case of the day is United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 2:00 am
Lord Neuberger and Lord Dyson referred to the four-limb test for proportionality in respect of interference with Convention rights as espoused by Lord Reed in Bank Mellat v HM Treasury (No. 2) [2013] UKSC 39. [read post]
30 Jan 2012, 4:29 am
Starting on Monday 30 January 2012 are the appeals of PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, (formerly VV [Jordan]), PP v Secretary of State for the Home Department, W & BB v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Z, G, U & Y v Secretary of State for the Home Department, scheduled for 1.5 days to be heard by Lords Phillips, Brown, Kerr, Dyson and Wilson. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 3:32 am
Considers whether the conditions of entitlement to State Pension Credit were compatible with Regulation 1408/71, which prohibits discrimination between nationals of different Member States. [read post]
14 Jul 2014, 5:31 pm
Further, as Lord Coledridge said in Harris v Qarre (1879) 4 CPD 125, an action for defamation turns not on the fact of a defendant having used defamatory expressions, but the fact of him having used those defamatory expressions. [read post]
10 Apr 2013, 5:06 pm
In last month’s unanimous judgment in Rothschild v Associated Newspapers Limited ([2013] EWCA Civ 197) the Court of Appeal upheld a decision that the defence of justification had been established in a claim brought by the financier Nat Rothschild against the Daily Mail. [read post]
24 Jul 2019, 2:15 am
The Supreme Court allowed the appeal of the Secretary of State. [read post]
22 May 2019, 4:58 pm
In Lord Carnwath’s view, the provision in s.67(8) RIPA for a route of appeal to the Secretary of State did not add anything, given that that power had not been exercised and was ultimately an executive power, so did not support the argument that the courts should not have ultimate control [104]. [read post]
6 Nov 2015, 7:30 am
The case was heard by Lord Neuberger, Lady Hale, Lord Mance, Lord Clarke, Lord Sumption, Lord Reed and Lord Toulson. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 1:46 am
Lord Lloyd-Jones gives the Court’s judgment. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 3:57 am
The decisions so far On the first issue, the courts below were necessarily bound by the principle espoused by the House of Lords in R v Bancoult (no 2) [2009] 1 AC 453: that declarations of application attach not to the land which is contained in the territory of the signatory state, but instead to the ‘political entities’ about which the declaration is made; with the result that a declaration lapses whenever a ‘new political entity’ is formed. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 6:13 am
Cathryn Houston, trainee solicitor at CMS, considers the case of Navigators Insurance Company Limited and others v Atlasnavios-Navegacao LDA (formerly Bnavios-Navegacao LDA), which is due to be heard by the UK Supreme Court on Tuesday 20 March 2018: On 20 March 2018, the UK Supreme Court (sitting in a panel comprising Lord Mance, Lord Sumption, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes, Lord Briggs) will hear this appeal relating to the interpretation and… [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 12:24 pm
As with Entick, the case of U.S. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 6:38 am
For this reason, Mr Anson had paid federal and state tax in the US on his share of HV’s profits. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 1:34 am
On 17 to 19 January 2012, the Supreme Court heard an appeal in the case of Homer v Chief Constable of West Yorkshire Police and Seldon v Clarkson Wright and Jakes . [read post]
13 May 2008, 1:19 pm
Just when, post Kay v Lambeth in the Lords, it looked like the issue of human rights defences to possession claims was pretty much settled (i.e. there pretty much weren’t any), the ECtHR has decided to put a large stick in the spokes. [read post]
15 Feb 2022, 5:35 am
[v] The Bill could therefore be introduced as soon as May 2022, although much of the detail is yet to be revealed. [read post]
10 Aug 2015, 4:55 am
Also see R (SG) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2015] UKSC 16, at paras 105-106 [read post]
