Search for: "MARCH v. PETER" Results 521 - 540 of 1,224
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Dec 2011, 2:26 pm by chief
Carnwath LJ approved Peter Smith J's statement at [17] of Hanoman v Southwark that: The wording of s. 124(1) could not, in my mind be plainer: they shall give a decision which is either in favour of accepting or denying the right to buy. [read post]
2 Dec 2011, 2:26 pm by chief
Carnwath LJ approved Peter Smith J's statement at [17] of Hanoman v Southwark that: The wording of s. 124(1) could not, in my mind be plainer: they shall give a decision which is either in favour of accepting or denying the right to buy. [read post]
13 Apr 2010, 1:57 pm by AALRR
National Labor Relations Board, in which the Supreme Court heard oral arguments on March 23, 2010. [read post]
30 Jun 2013, 12:44 pm by Florian Mueller
But Nokia avers that its products only process something that can be described as pseudo-planar: instead of separate U and V planes, there's a single data block containing a pair of U and V values for each pixel. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 6:37 am
Specifically at issue in the ICJ case, Questions relating to the Obligation to Prosecute or Extradite (Belgium v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 7:32 pm by Rick St. Hilaire
HSI seizes the dinosaur bones.Today's court conference in the matter of United States of America v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Oman, Natural Law and the Rhetoric of Empire: Reynolds v. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 6:30 am by Warren K. Zola
Vaccaro currently serves as a consultant for the plaintiffs in O’Bannon v. [read post]
12 Dec 2011, 9:43 pm by Walter Olson
Ashford Gear LLC)] Tags: class actions, Florida, Los Angeles, obesity, patent litigation, patent trolls, police, public employment, tobacco Related posts March 15 roundup (1) July 8 roundup (5) Fit for a foot chase? [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 11:14 pm
Supreme Court issued its ruling in Roe v. [read post]
9 Apr 2017, 4:33 pm by INFORRM
On 6 April 2017 Popplewell J handed down judgment in Stunt v Associated Newspapers, ([2017] EWHC 695 (QB)) (heard 1 and 2 March 2017). [read post]
22 Mar 2008, 2:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at the Subscribe page: [duncanbucknell.com] Highlights this week included:Google fails to obtain pan-EU trade mark protection for ‘Gmail’ due to confusingly similar German trade mark: (Class 46), (Ars Technica),UK High Court overturns UKIPO decision to refuse computer program patent application in Symbian’s Patent Application, UKIPO announces it will appeal (equivalent patent granted by EPO):… [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matthieu Dhenne (Ipsilon)
Boston Scientific, EIPR, vol. 20, No. 8, August 1998, pp. 132-134. [4] See for instance : Paris High Court, March 7, 2019, n° 17/14664, MSD v. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 4:26 pm by Ailyn Cabico
Written by: Ildiko Duckor and Peter Chess In light of the current regulatory environment, now more than ever, it is critical for you to comply with all of the legal requirements and best practices applicable to Investment Advisers. [read post]