Search for: "MATTER OF C B J B" Results 521 - 540 of 3,065
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jan 2021, 4:00 am by Michael Woods and Gordon LaFortune
This represents a bit of déjà vu as, just six months after NAFTA’s ratification in July 1995, the United States launched the first trade dispute under the agreement. [read post]
12 Feb 2014, 4:00 am by Administrator
Canada (Attorney general) [1989] 1 SCR 342SOPINKA J. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 11:23 am by Atty. Gregory A. Holbus
§ 157(b)(2)(C) does permit the bankruptcy court to rule on counterclaims to claims against the bankruptcy estate, the Court held that § 157(b)(2)(C) was unconstitutional.Why? [read post]
18 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The claimant brought a claim in (a) libel; (b) harassment; and (c) for breach of the GDPR against ‘Person(s) Unknown’ defined as being the authors, editors and publishers of the website. [read post]
22 Sep 2011, 12:42 pm by info@thomasjhenrylaw.com
One major change recommended in the draft guidelines is the expansion of the screening process from HIV only to include tests for hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV). [read post]
27 May 2015, 1:09 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  [Why would ability to circumvent matter there? [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 9:20 am
      `(b) Exceptions-            `(1) PRIOR INVENTOR DISCLOSURE EXCEPTION- Subject matter that would otherwise qualify as prior art under subparagraph (B) of subsection (a)(1) shall not be prior art to a claimed invention under that subparagraph if the subject matter had, before the applicable date under such subparagraph… [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Administrative Law Judge found, upon the hearing, that a preponderance of the evidence showed that the petitioner committed a category three act of neglect (see Social Services Law §§493[3][a][i]; [4][c]; 494[1][a]; 14 NYCRR 624.5[j][1][i]; 700.4-700.5). [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:30 am
  Starting from 1 October 2017, in order to be validly registered as a EU trade mark, the sign must still be capable of being represented, but any appropriate form of representation is admitted, as long as it “enables the competent authorities and the public to determine the clear and precise subject matter of the protection afforded to its proprietor” (Article 4, letter b), of the New Regulation). [read post]