Search for: "MATTER OF K A B" Results 521 - 540 of 2,717
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Aug 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
That requirement cannot rely on excluded (non-technical) subject matter alone however original it may be. [read post]
23 Dec 2013, 5:01 pm by oliver randl
See points [2.5] and [2(b)] of the reasons and the order, respectively. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
It is to be emphasized in this respect that, according to the principle of party disposition (A113(2)), it is the applicant’s or patentee’s responsibility to define the subject-matter of the application or the patent. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 2:15 pm by Ryan Bowers
 Further, a contractor or subcontractor who knowingly fails to pay the rate commits a Class B misdemeanor. [read post]
10 Apr 2008, 5:01 pm
REV. 801 Your Opinion Really Does Not Matter: How the Use Referenda in Funding Public University Student Groups Violates Constitutional Free Speech Principles Gregory B. [read post]
10 Jul 2010, 11:02 am by Oliver G. Randl
On entry into the European phase, non-unitary subject matter should be deleted. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 5:01 pm by oliver
“particularly relevant”) for all claims, even to expect – that the claimed subject-matter could be directed to such a particular embodiment or development after an amendment, so that the search should have encompassed subject-matter amended accordingly.It follows that – in the Board’s opinion – the subject-matter of the amended claim has to be considered to have been searched within the meaning of R 137(5), even if the feature added to… [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 5:30 am by Beth Graham
Following a hearing on the matter, the Western District of Texas granted the company’s motion in part. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:56 am by Alexandra Allan
Owners then retracted their offer (b) and made a “take it or leave it” offer to Charterers to accept the substituted vessel at a reduced freight rate, but one that did not reflect the reduction agreed with receivers, and to waive all claims arising out of Owners’ unauthorised re-fixture of the “CENK K”. [read post]
16 Oct 2010, 11:01 am by Oliver G. Randl
A 84 stipulates that the claims shall define the matter for which protection is sought. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
” [11] Thus, prima facie and when regarded separately, the meaning of both claims 13 and 14 is clear, i.e. they both relate to the same subject-matter. [12] However, as noted in point [2] above, the meaning of a claims is determined in the context of the whole application, i.e. also in context with other claims. [12.1] When claim 13 is regarded in context with claim 14 an uncertainty about the meaning of claim 13 arises in because claim 14 is dependent on claim 13, yet covers the same… [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 3:02 pm by Oliver G. Randl
Apparently the applicant is not familiar with patent matters and insufficiently informed on how time limits operate. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm by Oliver G. Randl
A 83 and A 100(b) concern sufficiency of disclosure and, in the words of T 608/07, whether an ambiguity deprives the skilled person of the promise of invention. [read post]