Search for: "MATTER OF R T"
Results 521 - 540
of 53,770
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2009, 5:19 pm
So are the representatives of the office of C&R. [9]To read the whole decision, click here. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 1:00 pm
The TechnoFeature newsletter is free so don't miss the next issue. [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:11 am
The board is however of the opinion that such is not the case (r.6.1). [read post]
12 Apr 2018, 12:11 am
The board is however of the opinion that such is not the case (r.6.1). [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 1:15 pm
I voted "R" in the last presidential election. [read post]
18 Dec 2012, 5:30 am
The case of R. v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 6:01 pm
The present board holds that the principles set out in T 1212/97 (affirmed by T 12/01 [20]; T 667/01 [2]) apply to the present case. [5.5] In T 1212/97 [3] the Board did not consider evidence from the lecturer alone as being satisfactory evidence as to what was made available to the public at the lecture. [read post]
30 Aug 2021, 10:09 am
I suppose the rationale is that one needs an expert to interpret ASTM standards--no matter what?] [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 9:01 pm
*retch* PC’s, it doesn’t matter what platform you’re on. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 9:52 pm
Maybe it just does[n]'t matter? [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 8:26 am
I don't believe that has happened here, but the priority for the White House going forward is making sure everyone who discusses this matter, particularly with Congress, is disclosing everything known to themselves or to anyone else in the Administration. [read post]
16 Jan 2009, 10:57 am
"Ultimately the error didn't matter for A. [read post]
22 Jan 2012, 5:01 pm
Therefore, again it was a matter of judgement for the examining division whether or not to base their reasoning on the case law developed for assessing mixtures of technical and non-technical features, e.g. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 3:02 pm
Such exceptions are set forth, in particular, in R 70(1) (no withdrawal of the request for examination) and in R 84(2) (possible continuation of opposition proceedings after withdrawal of the opposition). [read post]
12 Apr 2021, 9:30 am
" Is it news when something doesn't happen? [read post]
16 Apr 2010, 2:26 pm
The general exemption from the license requirement doesn't apply to vendors of expressive matter in certain high-traffic public spaces (e.g., certain entrances to Central Park). [read post]
23 Aug 2011, 3:01 pm
The fact that the recipient (here: the PR) takes notice of the mail only several days or even weeks after [the receipt] is not relevant because the only legal condition, i.e. the delivery to him, is fulfilled (T 247/98 [1]; T 172/04 [4]; T 743/05 [1.6-8]; T 261/07 [1.6]; T 529/09 [4]).Decision T 703/92, which has been invoked by the [opponent] is not to be understood differently. [read post]
5 Dec 2019, 4:00 am
The post Lawyers:Why You Need To Prepare a Business Plan, No Matter What appeared first on Cordell Parvin Blog. [read post]
9 Dec 2014, 11:11 am
Buried, as a matter a fact. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 7:24 am
It would have mattered to people who love him more than those who hate him.Trump's affairs don't conflict with much of anything anybody thinks of him. [read post]
