Search for: "MGN"
Results 521 - 540
of 542
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2015, 4:50 pm
Early support for this assumption was provided by Bean J in Cooke & Midland Heart Ltd v MGN [2014] EMLR 31 at [43]: I do not accept that in every case evidence will be required to satisfy the serious harm test. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 3:01 am
The Court of Appeal today handed down judgment in the case of JIH v News Group Newspapers Ltd ([2011] EWCA Civ 42). [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 5:50 am
In the Courts On Monday, 5 March 2012 Bean J gave judgment in the “offer of amends” case of KC v MGN Ltd ([2012] EWHC 483 (QB)). [read post]
25 Jul 2022, 1:54 am
On 20 July 2022, the Government published its Response to the Call for Evidence on Strategic Lawsuits against Public Participation [pdf]. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
SMALL TALK vs BIG TALK (The IP Factor) Serbia Serbia joins Hague Agreement on International Designs (Class 99) South Africa Bad faith and bona fide intentions (Afro-IP) Switzerland No sweet success for Wander against Dr Oetker in trade dress dispute over caramel puddings (Class 46) United Kingdom EWHC: Committal for contempt not fit for ‘grey area’ disputes: Grisbrook v MGN Ltd & Ors (IPKat) (PatLit) EWCA: Skilled… [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 1:26 am
The Michaelmas Term legal term begins on Thursday 1 October 2020 when the Inforrm summer break comes to an end. [read post]
1 May 2022, 4:30 pm
Twitter has accepted Elon Musk’s offer to buy the platform for $44bn and take the company private. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 1:09 am
MGN Ltd) as well as decisions of the German Federal Supreme Court (2.3.2010 – VI ZR 23/09); Regional Court Cologne (26.8.2009 – 28 O 478/08) and the Austrian Supreme Court (8.9.2009 – 4 Ob 138/09m) dealing with the questions of jurisdiction and applicable law with regard to the infringement of personal rights on the internet: “Persönlichkeitsverletzungen im Internet: Internationale Zuständigkeit und Kollisionsrecht” Anatol Dutta. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am
The claimant’s reliance on the reasoning in Gulati v MGN [2015] EWCA Civ 1291 (a claim in the tort of misuse of private information – “MPI” – arising from mobile phone hacking) in respect of the award of damages for the loss of control of private information was rejected. [read post]
10 Nov 2021, 3:29 am
This argument was founded on the Court of Appeal’s judgment in the case of Gulati v MGN, which concerned systematic phone hacking by journalists from the Mirror Group. [read post]
2 Mar 2016, 4:24 pm
This was recognised in Cooke & Midland Heart Limited v MGN Limited & Trinity Mirror Midlands Limited [2014] EWHC 2831 (QB), the first case that considered section 1(1) in any detail. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 1:53 am
After conducting a survey of the classifications used in the authorities including Campbell v MGN [2004] AC 457, Douglas v Hello! [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 4:11 pm
The same day, the application for permission to appeal in the case of Ferdinand v MGN was withdrawn, the matter having been compromised as between the parties. [read post]
9 Feb 2020, 4:05 pm
Manchester United have accused the Sun newspaper of receiving advanced notice of an intended attack on the house of executive vice-chairman Ed Woodward and have made a complaint to IPSO. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 4:36 am
Annotation to MGN Limited v. [read post]
27 Oct 2015, 5:36 pm
” He says this of his time as an employee of Mirror Group Newspapers (MGN), one of IPSO’s chief architects: “My big problem is corporate culture and office culture in tabloids. [read post]
29 Dec 2024, 4:34 pm
In Sir James Dyson v MGN Limited [2023] EWHC 3092 (KB), Jay J declined to draw an such an inference of serious harm where the contested publication was in a national newspaper. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 2:11 am
Reynolds and Jameel – the existing law Before examining the proposals in Lord Lester’s Defamation Bill it is perhaps worth summarising shortly the existing state of the Reynolds common law defence. [read post]
25 Jan 2013, 4:09 pm
In the case of Ashby Donald and others v France (Judgment of 10 January 2013) the Court of Human Rights has, for the first time in a judgment on the merits, clarified that a conviction based on copyright law for illegally reproducing or publicly communicating copyright protected material can be regarded as an interference with the right of freedom of expression and information under Article 10 of the European Convention. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:18 pm
That test is a crystallisation of a process first articulated in Campbell the same year (Campbell v MGN Ltd [2004] 2 AC 457), a case I’ll come back to. [read post]
