Search for: "MINING v. PRICE"
Results 521 - 540
of 559
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
(Securing Innovation) PriorSmart.com search tool, tracking patent documents (Competitive Info) (Patently-O) Patent damages as an incentive to transact (IP finance) IPscore, new patent evaluation toy (IP finance) Patent portfolios can pull companies out of financial rut (Law360) Global - Copyright Expanding the public domain: part zero (Creative Commons) Australia Pioneering decision on non-use: Pioneer Computers Australia Pty Limited v Pioneer KK (Australian… [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 9:17 am
Depending on the location of your law school, the price tag could be $600 per speaker. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 6:03 pm
., v. [read post]
25 Nov 2008, 12:02 pm
Price II, Judge. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 4:10 pm
Moreover, according to Article 177, Brazil has a monopoly of the prospecting, production, refining, transportation, mining, importing and exporting activities of petroleum and natural gas. [16] This means that whoever owns property on the surface of the land has no ownership rights on the underground resources. [read post]
11 Oct 2008, 3:07 am
(IP finance) High price for IP ephemera? [read post]
14 Sep 2008, 9:30 pm
The Report addresses single-firm conduct issues, such as exclusive dealing, predatory pricing, tying, bundling, loyalty discounts, and refusals to deal. [read post]
10 Sep 2008, 7:56 pm
Southeast Alaska Conservation Council, and Alaska v. [read post]
7 Sep 2008, 2:50 pm
" (citing in footnote 57 to Teachers' Retirement System of Louisiana v. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 12:44 pm
Case Name: Jacobs Ranch Coal Co. v. [read post]
25 Aug 2008, 10:27 am
See Weinberg v. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 8:07 am
: (IP finance), Technical assistance a key point of discussion at TRIPS Council: (Intellectual Property Watch), WIPO turmoil as new DG’s future comes under threat: (IAM), WIPO to host inter-regional forum to explore strategies to enhance development and service-orientation of IP offices: (WIPO), Controversy over lack of transparency and overreaching enforcement provisions in ACTA: (Spicy IP), (Spicy IP) Global - Trade Marks / Domain Names / Brands World anti-counterfeiting day:… [read post]
13 Jun 2008, 3:40 am
: (Patent Docs), Generic drug developers will continue to take advantage of global demand for lower-priced drugs, with Teva poised to maintain lead position says Goldman Sachs analyst: (GenericsWeb), Daiichi Sankyo takeover of Ranbaxy: (Profitability through Simplicity), (Spicy IP), (GenericsWeb), Canada: Generics to penetrate 26% pharma market in Canada says RNCOS research: (GenericsWeb), Canada: Generic drug makers spreading misinformation about patent regulation amendments to dodge real… [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 2:00 am
Protecting computer programs under the Copyright Act: Dais Studios v Bullet Creative: (IP Down Under), Assessing copyright risk in new classroom technologies: (IP Down Under), Cadbury loses battle over exclusive use of colour purple for chocolate wrapping in its case against Darrell Lea: (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog), (IP Down Under), (IPKat), (IPwar’s), Employee or independent contractor? [read post]
29 Mar 2008, 3:07 pm
I would imagine that Fordham Law School will be preparing audio and video materials, but that they will be sold at fairly high prices, and will not be available for broadcast. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 11:46 pm
E.g., Sullivan v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 12:44 am
This alleged scheme came in a case called Jones v. [read post]
27 Nov 2007, 10:20 pm
For the best written explanation of full (or sometimes called “normal”) backups v. incremental v. differential backups, read this article at TechRepublic: [articles.techrepublic.com.com]. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 4:02 pm
It's a mine field for the attorney and Matt will guide you through it. [read post]
6 Oct 2007, 11:10 pm
* Chang v. [read post]
