Search for: "Majors v. Good"
Results 521 - 540
of 17,200
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 May 2010, 8:52 pm
In Coker v. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 6:41 pm
In New York v. [read post]
3 Dec 2020, 2:40 pm
As the Supreme Court recognized in the Reno v. [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 1:13 am
After the Advocate General's opinion in September the question of restricting the sale of luxury goods online has finally landed on the CJEU's desk, who handed down their judgment only last week.As a brief primer, the case of Coty Germany GmbH v Parfümerie Akzente GmbH concerned the sale of luxury cosmetics made by Coty. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 1:46 pm
As an initial matter, the ALJ rejected Petitioner’s assertion that trademark settlement agreements are not subject to antitrust scrutiny in light of FTC v. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 5:01 am
In Picard v. [read post]
10 Sep 2007, 12:20 pm
Ironically, the majority in today's ruling notes that by holding that Kikumura no longer remains good law, the Third Circuit is disagreeing with rulings from both the Eighth and Ninth Circuits. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 1:05 am
The more controversial majority decision in Omnicare, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2019, 5:45 am
The decisionThe Board first noted that for a sign to possess distinctive character, it must serve to identify the goods and services in respect of which registration is sought as originating from a particular undertaking, and thus to distinguish those goods and services from those of other undertakings (C-473/01 P, Procter & Gamble v OHIM). [read post]
30 Jun 2020, 12:53 pm
Patent & Trademark Office v. [read post]
25 Aug 2021, 11:49 am
Whether you feel this is a good thing or a bad one depends on how you feel about the Google ruling. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 3:00 am
Liljestrand v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 4:14 pm
As I will explain, dicta in this Court's decision in Coker v. [read post]
29 Nov 2006, 7:08 pm
Yet, in KSR v. [read post]
22 Jan 2015, 3:11 pm
The prison officials could offer no good reason for restricting the inmate’s beard. [read post]
22 May 2008, 4:37 pm
Sherrod, 26 M.J. 30, 33 (C.M.A. 1988)).The majority then applied the test from Liljeberg v. [read post]
24 Nov 2020, 9:00 pm
This law, held unconstitutional, because a majority of the Court found it was so far removed from actual First Amendment doctrine in 1997 in Boerne v. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:29 pm
That’s good news.4. [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 10:29 pm
That’s good news.4. [read post]
26 Feb 2014, 8:19 am
The cases are Riley v. [read post]
