Search for: "Mann v. Mann" Results 521 - 540 of 1,399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Oct 2017, 4:17 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The decision was a strategic choice made in light of the lack of a meritorious defense (see Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292 [1st Dept 2001]). [read post]
6 Jan 2021, 3:11 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The court correctly determined that the complaint is devoid of allegations from which it could be inferred that any negligence by defendants in their handling of the family court proceeding was the “but for” causation of any damages (see Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293 [1st Dept 2001]; see also Phillips-Smith Specialty Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1st Dept 1999], lv denied 94 NY2d 759 [2000]). [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 6:25 am by Kiran Bhat
Finally, at this blog, Ronald Mann recaps Tuesday’s arguments in Hall v. [read post]
18 Jun 2008, 6:23 pm
  Thanks to Columbia Law School (one of my alma maters) Professor Ronald Mann for the heads-up. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 3:11 am
Further, as defendants were retained to try to obtain a reduction in the penalties assessed against plaintiffs, and they succeeded, there can be no claim that they breached a duty to plaintiffs (see generally Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293 [2001]). [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 3:11 am
Further, as defendants were retained to try to obtain a reduction in the penalties assessed against plaintiffs, and they succeeded, there can be no claim that they breached a duty to plaintiffs (see generally Dweck Law Firm v Mann, 283 AD2d 292, 293 [2001]). [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 3:56 am by Amy Howe
Mann was not involved in our coverage of the case.] [read post]
22 May 2015, 4:00 am by INFORRM
Quantum in Privacy Cases The judge considered thirteen “comparables” – from Cornelius v Taranto ([2001] EMLR 329) to Weller v Associated Newspapers ([2014] EMLR 24) ([171] to [183]). [read post]
8 Jan 2012, 9:01 pm by Kali Borkoski
  Ronald Mann previewed the second argument of the day, Kappos v. [read post]
1 Feb 2011, 3:53 am
OMH, Lambert claimed, (1) found her to be her eligible for FMLA benefits on February 1995 but (2) terminated her in March 1995.The court never reached the merits of Lambert’s allegations, holding that [s]ince Lambert’s FMLA claim against the Office of Mental Health is predicated on a request for leave involving her own health condition (in contrast, for example, to a request for leave for the birth of a child), it is barred by the Eleventh Amendment.The court cited Hale v… [read post]
13 Oct 2010, 5:54 am by Mary A. Fischer
” The specter of another high-profile Texas death penalty case looms over Skinner v. [read post]
17 May 2012, 6:26 am by Cormac Early
Coverage of Monday’s decision in Hall v. [read post]