Search for: "Marbury v. Marbury" Results 521 - 540 of 904
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Aug 2012, 1:15 pm
"Ice Age: Continental Drift" is not "A Streetcar Named Desire," but it is better than re-reading Marbury v. [read post]
15 Aug 2012, 7:25 am by Floyd Abrams
There, as in our class, is his stunningly self-assured dismissal of Marbury v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 1:13 pm by Kathryn Watts
  According to Bickel, the Court’s ability to decline to exercise jurisdiction otherwise given helps the Court to respond to the limits of its countermajoritarian role and institutional competence, even though it also underscores the difficulty of reconciling certiorari with Chief Justice Marshall’s statements in Marbury v. [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 8:01 am by Michael Seidman
At the dawn of the American constitutional tradition, John Marshall wrote in Marbury v. [read post]
3 Aug 2012, 8:04 am by Lawrence Solum
Its highly developed dispute settlement system, which is one of the few in international law to include a standing appellate body, invites comparisons to the institution of judicial review in the United States under the paradigm of Marbury v. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 11:03 am by Lindsay Griffiths
Stuart said he would show us how Chief Justice Roberts maneuvered, and many are praising him, saying that this is what John Marshall did in Marbury v Madison. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:40 pm by Jason Potter
Let’s say you’d like to keep abreast of the latest cases mentioning Marbury v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:58 am by Marissa Miller
On the health care front, Michael Bobelian at Forbes analyzes the Chief Justice’s opinion and concludes that, although the Affordable Care Act “largely survived, the reasoning behind the decision represents a significant victory for conservative jurisprudence” – a “duality,” Bobelian suggests, that “resembles Marbury v. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:06 am by J. Gordon Hylton
Marshall did this most famously with his opinion in Marbury v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:02 pm
The introduction to Chief Justice Robert’s opinion (and the corresponding dissent) cite opinions that first year law students (and even high school students taking classes on American Government) would be familiar: Marbury v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 12:02 pm
The introduction to Chief Justice Robert’s opinion (and the corresponding dissent) cite opinions that first year law students (and even high school students taking classes on American Government) would be familiar: Marbury v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 10:19 am by Gerard N. Magliocca
Laird and (indirectly) in Marbury; a famously slippery opinion by Chief Justice Marshall.1804:  Jefferson is reelected with a large majority in Congress and confirms his party's preeminence.1828:  Jackson wins the Presidency and creates the modern Democratic Party.1830:  Congress enacts the Removal Act to "assist" the Cherokee Nation's departure from Georgia, which is fiercely opposed by a coalition that becomes the Whig Party.1832:  The Supreme Court… [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 12:49 pm by Lawrence Solum
United States) harkened back to Chief Justice Marshall's approach in Marbury v. [read post]