Search for: "Mark v. Wish" Results 521 - 540 of 2,170
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Nov 2016, 2:42 am
| Friday Fantasies | Meet the Trade Mark Judges (Part One) | HHJ Hacon amplifies the law on EU trade mark jurisdiction: AMS-Neve v Heritage Audio | Launch of IP Pro Bono scheme | Lundbeck v European Commission - a rotten decision or effective competition law enforcement? [read post]
14 Apr 2021, 8:43 am by INFORRM
Later that same day, as journalists and bystanders watched, the applicant, Kaloyan Handzhiyski, the then chairman of the local chapter of the party Democrats for a Strong Bulgaria (DSB), arrived, and placed a red Santa Claus cap on the head of the already painted statute and, at its feet, leave a red sack bearing a white band marked ‘Resignation’. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 4:00 am by Administrator
It is well established in trademark jurisprudence that the owner of a mark is not legally responsible for torts allegedly perpetrated by its user: Batten v Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd., 2017 ONSC 53, at para. 153. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 9:59 am by Big Tent Democrat
While it is with a heavy heart, I wish him the best in his retirement. [read post]
14 May 2010, 9:02 am by INFORRM
  This was first posted on 16 March 2010 and is the second part of a post in which Mark Thomson and Nicola McCann discuss the law and practice of harassment as applied to the media. [read post]
4 Jun 2007, 12:14 am
Glucksberg and Vacco v. [read post]
28 Sep 2014, 4:00 pm
 There's also a feature of the prospects of a single trade mark law to cover the Gulf Cooperation Council States. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 11:47 am
Shoenfeld, Mark (1997), “Waging battle: Ashford v. [read post]
6 May 2011, 8:09 am by Adam Gillette
As I am sure you know, this year marks the start of the Civil War's sesquicentennial. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 2:45 am
In his excitement to blog all things bright and beautiful last week, the IPKat overlooked Microsoft Corporation v P4 Com Ltd and another, a Chancery Division decision of Mr Justice Rimer last Wednesday. [read post]