Search for: "Marks v. Social Security Administration"
Results 521 - 540
of 600
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2011, 1:53 pm
” Over time, these restrictions were removed – a trend most dramatically marked by the 1967 United States Supreme Court ruling in Loving v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 5:16 am
Mark Lemley – Obama administration seems to be interested in directing ISPs to cut off parts of the internet they don’t like—an internet kill switch, which worked so well in Egypt. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 6:00 am
Each count of Social Security fraud carries a maximum penalty of up to five years in prison and a $250,000 fine. [read post]
5 Apr 2011, 3:33 pm
Marks & Spencer. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 2:42 pm
By Andrew Delaney Louko v. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 4:56 am
If you plan to take advantage of the VITA program, the IRS encourages you to bring the following items with you to the site: Proof of identification Social Security Cards for you, your spouse and dependents and/or a Social Security Number verification letter issued by the Social Security Administration or Individual Taxpayer Identification Number (ITIN) assignment letter for you, your spouse and dependents Proof of Foreign status if… [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 6:00 am
” State v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 4:56 pm
Today, it's FCC v. [read post]
5 Feb 2011, 10:22 am
“If we make America the best place to do business, businesses should make their mark in America. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
Problem In 1978, Congress enacted the Indian Child Welfare Act to address the “alarmingly high percentage of Indian families […] broken up by the removal, often unwarranted, of their children from them by nontribal public and private agencies and institutions,” as well as the fact “that the States, exercising their recognized jurisdiction over Indian child custody proceedings through administrative… [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 11:25 am
Problem In 1978, Congress enacted the Indian Child Welfare Act to address the “alarmingly high percentage of Indian families […] broken up by the removal, often unwarranted, of their children from them by nontribal public and private agencies and institutions,” as well as the fact “that the States, exercising their recognized jurisdiction over Indian child custody proceedings through administrative… [read post]
Mayo Foundation v. U.S.: Supreme Court Brushes Off Medical Residents, Unsettles Agency Deference Law
13 Jan 2011, 3:30 am
United States: Congress funds Social Security by taxing both employers and employees under FICA on the wages employees earn. ... [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 2:12 pm
In Rodriguez, the court upheld the criminal CFAA conviction of defendant Roberto Rodriguez, a former Social Security Administration (“SSA”) telephone service representative, because he accessed confidential and sensitive files for “a non-business reason. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 8:36 am
Many were surprised that the former Bush v. [read post]
1 Jan 2011, 10:23 am
Justice BhatThe Delhi High Court in Shri Rohit Shekhar vs Shri Narayan Dutt Tiwari & Anr., has examined the concept of DNA testing and the law pertaining to the same. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 10:57 am
: straddling Islamic law and U.S. justice / Mark E. [read post]
8 Oct 2010, 2:14 pm
Administrative LawKD4882 .P76 2010The regulatory enterprise : government, regulation, and legitimacy / Tony Prosser.Prosser, Tony.Oxford ; New York : Oxford University Press, 2010.AfricaHQ1798.5 .S89 2010Beyond women's empowerment in Africa : exploring dislocation and agency / Elinami Veraeli Swai.Swai, Elinami Veraeli.New York : Palgrave Macmillan, 2010.Banks and BankingHG1811 .D38 2010Banking on the future : the fall and rise of central banking / Howard Davies, David Green.Davies, H.… [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 6:01 am
Defense attorney Hilliard V. [read post]
4 Oct 2010, 7:42 am
DECISIONS Sackett v. [read post]
30 Sep 2010, 6:23 pm
“Instead,” DeBofsky said, “courts conduct reviews of claim records assembled and shaped by self-serving insurance companies without hearing any testimony whatsoever, under a procedure that gives more deference to the insurance company than a court would give a Social Security administrative law judge in its review of a Social Security disability benefit claim denial. [read post]
