Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 521 - 540
of 9,189
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Jun 2012, 6:35 pm
In a forum that has taken pains to praise United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2018, 1:52 pm
As explained in the case of United Biscuits v Asda [1997] RPC 513, customers might be misled by the similarities of get-up, confusion has a broad interpretation and does not require an intention to deceive. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
The title of the article is The Quiet Coup, and it's introductory paragraph changed my whole year… The crash has laid bare many unpleasant truths about the United States. [read post]
24 Aug 2020, 4:07 am
TMC obtained a concurrent use registration for the entire United States except for the state of Oklahoma. [read post]
2 May 2011, 4:06 am
United States; Plessy v. [read post]
11 Oct 2010, 12:59 pm
The false marking statute includes a bounty hunter (i.e., qui tam) provision providing that “[a]ny person may sue for the penalty, in which event one-half shall go to the person suing and the other to the use of the United States. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 7:48 am
This phrase, as well as its accompanying ‘Walking Fingers’ logo, are registered trade marks in many countries around the world, including the UK, Canada, and Australia – though curiously not the United States. [read post]
13 Jun 2019, 3:04 am
The article reports the results of a "systematic empirical study of how the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) has applied the immoral-or-scandalous prohibition in practice. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 9:11 am
Clontech Labs, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2013, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2010, 2:10 pm
On Monday, November 1, 2010, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2018, 5:58 am
Applicant, United Trademark Holdings, Inc., filed for registration of the mark RAPUNZEL for dolls and toy figures. [read post]
24 Jul 2015, 12:39 pm
Chicago, Illinois - The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit affirmed the ruling of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Western Division in the matter of Sorenson v. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 4:38 am
" DuPont factors two and three: The Board improperly discounted the evidence that "COGNAC certified product has an intimate and legendary history with music, particularly rap music and hip-hop music, in the United States. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 4:15 pm
To apply United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 6:33 pm
Madison United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2020, 3:26 am
Lacteos de Honduras S.A. v. [read post]
31 Mar 2023, 10:52 am
In Interprofession du Gruyere v. [read post]
2 Aug 2016, 2:00 am
United States. [read post]
10 Jul 2019, 4:38 pm
On 2 July 2019, Advocate General (AG) Bobek delivered his opinion in Case C-240/18 P Constantin Film Produktion GmbH v European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), advising that the EUIPO’s decision to reject the registration of the trade mark ‘Fack Ju Göhte’ because it was too offensive should be annulled. [read post]
