Search for: "Marks v. United States"
Results 521 - 540
of 10,322
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2010, 11:00 am
Currently, any individual may bring a claim on behalf of the United States for false patent marking. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 8:27 am
Agler custom manufactures guitars and sells them across the United States. [read post]
25 May 2023, 1:33 pm
United States. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 4:02 am
Criticizing Comprehensive Drug Testing, posted here, is United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 1:20 pm
Import: Section 337:Trademark:Registered mark, Common-law mark:Secondary meaning:Word mark: Product-packaging trade dress: Product-design trade dress:Restatement (Third) of Unfair Competition:Appeal from the United States International Trade Commission in Investigation No. 337-TA-936.Section 337 provides a remedy at the ITC for, among other things, “the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the… [read post]
11 Sep 2023, 9:27 am
People v. [read post]
9 Nov 2006, 9:11 pm
The various federal courts across the United States apply a number of different factors to determine whether the use of a mark is likely to cause confusion with a previously-existing mark. [read post]
23 Jul 2013, 2:56 am
The CAFC then dismissed the appeal as moot and remanded the case to "allow the Board to consider a motion to vacate its decision in the first instance, in accordance with United States Bancorp Mortgage Company v. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 10:53 am
June 2011 marks the 40th anniversary of President Richard Nixon's declaration of a "war on drugs" — a war that has cost roughly a trillion dollars, has produced little to no effect on the supply of or demand for drugs in the United States, and has contributed to making America the world's largest incarcerator. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 6:37 am
Petitioner Mark Nixon was Australian and Respondent Gail Nixon was from the United States. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 4:35 pm
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia dismissed Bayer’s Section 43(a) false association and false advertising claims under FRCP 12(b)(6) and entered judgment on the pleadings as to Bayer’s Section 14(3) claim, ruling that the Lanham Act does not allow an owner of a foreign mark not registered in the United States, who does not use the mark in the United States [Bayer], to assert priority rights over a mark that… [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 4:00 am
The United Stated District Court for the Northern District of Illinois held invalid the product configuration mark shown immediately below, for beach towels, finding the circular shape to be functional. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 3:02 pm
The post The Sackett Oral Argument and the Problem of Defining "Waters of the United States" appeared first on Reason.com. [read post]
23 Jun 2016, 3:07 pm
Lyle reported on the decisions in Fisher and United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 10:36 pm
So held the United States Supreme Court on Monday, resoundingly, if a bit uneasily, in Iancu v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 4:03 am
Hermilo Tamez Salazar, 108 USPQ2d 1063 (TTAB 2013) [precedential].Applicant Salazar admitted in his interrogatory answers, and in a declaration filed with the Board, that he had not used the subject mark on any product sold in the United States and had not shipped any product into the United States. [read post]
16 Apr 2009, 8:00 am
United States applied the classical theory, not the misappropriation theory; and United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2010, 8:00 am
Citing United States v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 5:59 am
According to the United States National Restaurant Association, there are more than 1,000,000 restaurants in the United States. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 7:50 am
Here is the abstract: Professor Mark Tushnet contends that Roper v. [read post]
