Search for: "Marks v. United States Department of Justice" Results 521 - 540 of 1,600
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jan 2019, 9:01 pm by Public Employment Law Press
This amendment set out New YorkState's response to the United States Supreme Court's decision in Janus v American Federation of State, County, and Municipal Employees, Council 31, et al, 138 SCt 2448.In Janus the high court held that states and public-sector unions may no longer require "nonconsenting employees" in a collective bargaining unit to pay an "agency shop fee" in lieu of becoming a member the certified or… [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 11:13 am by Mark Walsh
United States, one of the court’s many immigration cases this term. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 12:07 am by Joey Fishkin
United States, courts reasoned that large company-wide statistical disparities had to come from somewhere. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 4:12 am
The Preamble lays the groundwork for the rest of the document: "We the people of the United States, in order to form a more perfect union, establish justice, insure domestic tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general welfare, and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America. [read post]
4 May 2022, 5:01 am by Albert W. Alschuler
It had previously sought the prosecution of Mark Meadows and Steve Bannon for the same crime. [read post]
17 May 2012, 7:55 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
19 Aug 2022, 6:06 am by Albert W. Alschuler
A final section notes gaps in the admissible evidence and suggests ways in which the Justice Department might fill them. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 8:48 pm by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
  Mossoff's article is written in the wake of Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which asks whether a guilty plea waives a defendant’s right to appeal the constitutionality of the law At Take Care, Samuel Bagenstos argues that in Husted v. [read post]
21 Apr 2021, 10:44 am by Bona Law PC
DPAs seem to be slowly becoming an efficient instrument for the Department of Justice to tackle antitrust conspiracies, and we expect this trend to continue. [read post]
30 Apr 2019, 4:10 am by Edith Roberts
” In the most recent episode of SCOTUStalk, Kimberly Robinson joins Amy Howe to discuss last week’s oral argument in Department of Commerce v. [read post]
8 Sep 2017, 10:23 am by Garrett Hinck
” Kahn posted the Justice Department’s brief opposing cert in Bahlul v. [read post]
12 May 2009, 7:38 am
§ 128-1.5007 (Department of Justice); DoD Instruction 5410.20 § 7.1 (Department of Defense). [read post]