Search for: "Marshall v. WE Marshall Co." Results 521 - 540 of 767
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Dec 2011, 12:35 pm by Jake Linford
The black letter test asks (1) whether we all intended our independent, copyrightable contributions to merge into an inseparable whole, and (2) whether we intended everyone to be a co-author. [read post]
22 Nov 2011, 11:02 am by Kiera Flynn
Certiorari stage documents:Opinion below (9th Cir.)Petition for certiorariBrief in oppositionPetitioner's reply State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 12:48 pm by Randy Barnett
That difficulty is troubling, but not fatal, not least because we are interpreting the scope of a long-established constitutional power, not recognizing a new constitutional right.This is a remarkably blithe acceptance of a claim of a practically unlimited congressional power that belies Chief Justice Marshall’s injunction in Marbury v. [read post]
8 Nov 2011, 2:19 am by John Day
You can read the entire opinion in Dick Broadcasting Co., Inc. of Tennessee v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 12:10 pm by Kali Borkoski
  But I like the system we’ve got here. [read post]
25 Oct 2011, 4:05 pm by John McFarland
I reluctantly concur, based on the Texas Supreme Court's holding in BP America Production Co. v. [read post]
24 Oct 2011, 3:28 pm by Michael C. Smith
The Alan This is actually Pier 1's lead counsel Alan Fisch's second time on the winning team in Marshall for a defendant - three years ago he and Sam Baxter succeeded in obtaining a jury verdict invalidating the plaintiff's patents on electrical connectors in Cooper Technologies Co. v. [read post]