Search for: "Massachusetts Department of Corrections" Results 521 - 540 of 967
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Sep 2013, 5:30 am by Donna Ballman
Here's what the Department of Labor says about second opinions: An employer may, at its own expense, require the employee to obtain a second medical certification from a health care provider. [read post]
4 Aug 2008, 6:30 am
Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections, 2008 U.S. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 12:36 pm by Coral Beach
  The patients are distributed across the country, living in California, Georgia, Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey and Texas. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 1:13 pm by Suzanne Ito
" The ACLU of Maryland helped Robert Collins to make headlines after his employer, the Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, asked for his Facebook password during a reinstatement interview after a leave of absence following a death in his family. [read post]
3 Jan 2022, 11:12 am by Madeline Salinas and Libbie Canter
  The CPA provides consumers the rights of access, correction, deletion, and to opt-out of processing of personal data for purposes of targeted advertising, the sale of personal data, and profiling. [read post]
11 Mar 2024, 7:55 am by Friedman & Ranzenhofer
” The article claims that Amazon uses “a variety of underhanded tactics to skirt Department of Transportation oversight” and that it fails to institute mandatory rules, regulations and procedures to ensure that its delivery drivers have proper training and qualifications. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 8:14 pm by Altman & Altman
Department of Labor’s Occupational Safety and Health Administration revealed that Nascimento’s Ludlow-based employer A. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 12:00 pm by Howard Friedman
First Amendment Center reports on the case.A release from the Rutherford Institute reports that it has filed suit in Virginia federal district court challenging a Virginia Department of Corrections directive that prohibits inmates from receiving CDs containing spoken words. [read post]
30 Aug 2011, 8:53 am by kraig
The legal limit in Massachusetts is 0.08. [read post]
24 Apr 2018, 1:58 pm by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Please bring to our attention any inaccuracies that may be included so they may be corrected, or information removed as requested. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 4:43 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Additional Resources: Man Charged With Drunk Driving, Found Sleeping at Police Department, June 7, 2017, By Abbey Niezgoda, NBC Boston More Blog Entries: Massachusetts Drugged Driving a Serious Problem, Police Say, March 28, 2017, DUI Injury Lawyer Blog The post DUI “Sleeper” Cases in Boston appeared first on Boston Drunk Driving Accident Lawyer Blog. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
In New Hampshire, which forgoes an income tax and is home to many residents who normally work out of offices in Massachusetts, the state Department of Justice is exploring Massachusetts’ new sourcing rule with an eye to possible litigation. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 9:00 pm
Police Department of Boston, in which the court refused to follow the Supreme Court's reasoning in Sutton v. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 3:58 am
Julie Walburn, spokeswoman for the Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, said, "We're considering all options at this time. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 10:46 am by David Oscar Markus
Under that approach the value in bribes paid by a defendant on pretrial release to his supervising corrections officer in exchange for greater freedom while on release and freedom from jail does satisfy § 666(a)(1)(B)’s monetary requirement. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 10:42 am by Coral Beach
The number of ill people reported from each state is as follows: Indiana 1, Massachusetts 1, Michigan 4, New Jersey 1, New York 4, and Pennsylvania 1. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 12:06 pm by admin
The Department of Justice has the option of intervening in the suit or declining to do so. [read post]
14 Dec 2009, 9:00 pm by David Conforto
Police Department of Boston, in which the court refused to follow the Supreme Court's reasoning in Sutton v. [read post]