Search for: "Matter of Clark v Clark" Results 521 - 540 of 1,890
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2018, 1:00 am by Aimee Denholm
Commissioners for HMRC v Taylor Clark Leisure Plc (Scotland), heard 11 Apr 2018. [read post]
21 Mar 2022, 3:24 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
The “doctrine of judicial estoppel may bar a party from pursuing claims which were not listed in a previous bankruptcy proceeding” (Moran Enters., Inc. v Hurst, 160 AD3d 638, 640 [2d Dept 2018], lv denied 32 NY3d 908 [2018], rearg denied 32 NY3d 1195 [2019]; see Popadyn v Clark Constr. [read post]
26 Oct 2007, 12:20 pm
LEXIS 2370 (October 22, 2007): As a preliminary matter, we observe that this court has expressed its concern over "'the increasingly common practice of police stopping vehicles for minor traffic offenses and seeking consent to search with no suspicion whatsoever of illegal contraband[.]'" Clark v. [read post]
20 Feb 2012, 5:22 am by Blog Editorial
In the matter of Peacock, heard 14 December 2011. [read post]
25 Sep 2019, 4:25 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
” “”It is a well-established principle that a simple breach of contract is not to be considered a tort unless a legal duty independent of the contract itself has been violated” (Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 9:30 pm by Sean Burke
In Doctor’s Associates, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm by Christopher Brown, Matrix.
It was common ground that if they were, they could not be justified as a matter of EU law. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]
18 Dec 2015, 9:11 am by Stephanie Smith, Arden Chambers
” His Lordship’s approach to construction was premised in part on Lord Clarke JSC’s summary of the relevant principles in Rainy Sky SA v Kookmin Bank [2011] UKSC 50, paras 14-30. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 11:27 am by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) I’ve just filed a reply brief in Herrera v. [read post]