Search for: "Matter of Crawford" Results 521 - 540 of 1,015
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Mar 2020, 2:04 pm by Margaret Taylor, Benjamin Wittes
” We can’t fault House leaders for following expert advice on the matter. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 11:04 am
Supreme Court addressed the issue of whether “basis” testimony is offered for the truth of the matter asserted. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 10:34 am by Matt Cameron
No matter how this all comes out, this case is well worth looking for next week. [read post]
11 Jan 2020, 5:48 am by Joel R. Brandes
.,2019), the Appellate Division held, as a matter of first impression for the Court, that, in a proceeding to establish standing to assert parental rights in seeking visitation and custody under Domestic Relations Law § 70, the court has the discretion to direct the “more monied” party to pay the other party’s counsel and expert fees under Domestic Relations Law § 237 before that party has been adjudicated a parent. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 5:01 am
"   Alicea's testimony improperly communicated out-of-court testimonial statements of cooperating witnesses and confidential informants under the guise of expert testimony, in violation of the Confrontation Clause and the Supreme Court's holding in Crawford v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 2:55 am by Michael DelSignore
The dissent of Justice Kagan revealed a very strong interpretation of the right of confrontation that was articulated in Crawford and Melendez-Diaz. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 10:07 am by R.J. MacReady
However, assuming the statements were “testimonial,” Hervey went on to make the excellent point that if the statements were truly “background” evidence not offered for the truth of the matter asserted, then it didn’t matter how damning the details were because they did not violate the Confrontation Clause. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 7:59 am by Richard D. Friedman
If a child is not capable of being a witness for Confrontation Clause purposes but a prosecutor offers her statement against an accused, then the accused should have a right — both as a matter of ordinary procedural law and as a matter of due process — to examine the child, as he would an inanimate object that is the source of crucial evidence against him. [read post]
3 May 2010, 3:37 pm by Dwight Sullivan
Faraj then made a Crawford objection, maintaining that the statement was obtained as part of an investigation and the defense wouldn’t have an opportunity to cross-examine SO2 Keefe, since he plans to invoke. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 11:40 am by Rebecca Tushnet
As a theoretical matter, does co-regulation have to come from the executive/legislative branches? [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 8:54 am by Bridget Crawford
Investigating Disparities in OECD Member and Contributing Countries Bridget Crawford, Pace University Elizabeth Haub School of Law and Lee-ford Tritt, University of Florida Levin College of Law, The Appalachia Tax Pedagogy Roundtable: Bringing Race, Gender, and Class into the Wills and Trusts Classroom Karen Sneddon, Mercer University Walter F. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 4:50 pm by Bridget Crawford
There is no subject-matter limitation for submissions, as long as the paper relates in some way to women, gender, and the law. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 6:01 am by Bridget Crawford
There is no subject-matter limitation for submissions, as long as the paper relates in some way to women, gender, and the law. [read post]