Search for: "Matter of Goldstein"
Results 521 - 540
of 974
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Apr 2014, 2:49 pm
The petition raises more issues than the protagonist in a student-written play, involving whether it was clearly established in 2008 that tasing a handcuffed but non-cooperative detainee eight times violates the Fourth Amendment; the burden of disproving qualified immunity; and subject matter jurisdiction. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:04 pm
Matthew Goldstein, New York Times: ”A growing number of big corporate clients are demanding that their law firms take more steps to guard against online intrusions that could compromise sensitive information as global concerns about hacker threats mount. [read post]
30 Mar 2014, 6:01 pm
Tuesday’s arguments in Loughrin v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 2:29 pm
Minow: Why does this matter? [read post]
12 Mar 2014, 7:25 am
” [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, was among the counsel to the petitioner in BG Group; however, I am not affiliated with the firm.] [read post]
6 Mar 2014, 1:06 pm
The matter then moved to federal court. [read post]
28 Feb 2014, 9:19 am
But why doesn’t this connection matter? [read post]
17 Feb 2014, 10:18 am
(Note: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the petitioner in this case. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
11 Feb 2014, 10:37 am
For standing purposes, it’s a matter of conjecture which firm is which. [read post]
6 Feb 2014, 4:44 am
. - stuff that nobody can really prove...) by adding new language that attempts to put a restriction on these add ons.But an exception to the exception is that if there is a "catastrophic injury" then such add ons may be applicable.This is creating a bit of debate in the legal circles.Some are thinking that this language may supersede portions of LC 3208.3, others say that the sections are different and that there is no inter-relationship.Still others believe that there might be some relationship in… [read post]
3 Feb 2014, 1:17 pm
Mark Goldstein contributed to the content of this post. [read post]
18 Jan 2014, 12:21 pm
The panel also: Ruled that Cox's crime-charging post dealt with "a matter of public concern". [read post]
16 Jan 2014, 7:21 am
(Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the petitioner in Lane.) [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 2:21 pm
The blog is financially independent from the firm of Goldstein & Russell, P.C. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 1:45 am
In the Matter of Jason Goldstein, Respondent... [read post]
20 Dec 2013, 7:11 am
Goldstein, and David E. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:54 am
In the Matter of Jason Goldstein, Respondent (AWC 2012033318101, December 11, 2013).... [read post]
11 Dec 2013, 6:12 am
Continuing to slough the matter off to your PR team will only make matters worse. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 5:00 am
” Yet he said no matter how lavishly the children lived before a divorce, there were limits to what they might expect afterward. [read post]
