Search for: "Matter of Jonathan H." Results 521 - 540 of 880
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Mar 2016, 7:46 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
If we look at other constitutional settings in which one entity must consent to the proposal of another actor before the proposal can take legal effect, we have as a general matter not inferred any duty on the part of the second actor to do anything. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 5:16 am by Jonathan H. Adler
This would, in effect, turn the matter over to the next administration and leave open the possibility that the dispute over immigration reform could be resolved by the political process. [read post]
11 Feb 2018, 9:08 am by Jonathan H. Adler
I further addressed the initial (and highly problematic) trial court opinion in this post, in which I wrote: Whether or not Mann's work shows all that he has claimed is not the question, for the First Amendment protects robust discussion and debate of scientific matters and the freedom to express wrong-headed opinions in inartful ways. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 9:37 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Judge O'Connor later writes: The Intervenor Defendants argue the Individual Plaintiffs cannot plead a constitutional injury (or any justiciable injury, for that matter) because the Individual Mandate no longer compels compliance. . . . [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 1:49 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
President Trump stated the matter bluntly: "If the Supreme Court rules that Obamacare is out, we'll have a plan that is far better than Obamacare. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 9:05 am by Jonathan H. Adler
” We, the Princeton Open Campus Coalition, refuse to let our peers be intimidated or bullied into silence on these–or any–important matters. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 4:54 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
This matters because, as the court has stressed time and again, Congress may create procedural rights that ease the standing burden. [read post]
14 Mar 2019, 10:43 am
What ultimately matters is to attain a state of consciousness where everything ceases to matter, so that one can rest in peace. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 8:23 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
As a technical matter, the Court did not rule against standing-by-inseverability, so the claim could theoretically be revived in a subsequent case. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
No matter how true that might be, what matters is that they will never have the chance to win again.NeverTrumpers to the Rescue? [read post]
28 May 2021, 6:32 am by Jonathan H. Adler
Footnote 2 reads: "While we  ultimately disagree with the district court, we appreciate the district judge's diligence in handling this matter. [read post]
16 Nov 2021, 10:20 am by Jonathan H. Adler
But the FDA relied on literature concerning flavored ENDS products' appeal to youths because those risks are understood as a matter of scientific consensus. [read post]