Search for: "Matter of State of New York v David D."
Results 521 - 540
of 606
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2010, 1:39 am
David Paterson to remove the term "mental retardation" from the title of the New York’s agency “Office of Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities” and from anywhere in the state statutes and regulations. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm
The original case filed in the matter went to trial in 2005 in U.S. [read post]
December 29, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm
The original case filed in the matter went to trial in 2005 in U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 12:34 pm
REGULATION D GENERAL SOLICITATION BAN. [read post]
December 21, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
21 Dec 2009, 10:57 am
— Imelda V. [read post]
4 Mar 2020, 2:18 pm
That case, Stoyas v. [read post]
3 Oct 2010, 11:01 pm
Speaking of Mercedes-Benzes, David Lat (Above the Law) discusses a D.C. divorce lawyer who sued a client (also a lawyer) for half a million dollars on top of the $378,000 he’d already been paid, and wound up paying the client the price of a new S-Class. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:30 pm
From 2001 to 2004, while I was in private practice in New York City, I also chaired the Judiciary Committee of the New York City Bar Association, which rates all the nominees and candidates for federal, state and local judicial office in New York City. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 1:01 pm
The New York Times article on Justice Stevens' announcing his retirement from the Supreme Court. [read post]
28 Oct 2019, 1:07 pm
The subcommittee will hear testimony from David Schenker, the assistant secretary of state for near eastern affairs, and Michael Harvey, the assistant administrator for the Middle East at the U.S. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 7:59 pm
Brown and David Matusow, Bahr, et al. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
Motz, to felony obstruction of justice charges and violation of the Act to Prevent Pollution from Ships related to concealing deliberate vessel pollution from the M/V Iorana, a Greek flagged cargo ship that made port calls in Baltimore, Tacoma, Wash., and New Orleans. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 3:24 pm
Troops, Inc. v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:29 am
The Court thus cloaks in the rhetoric of volition a policy in tension with constitutionally-pedigreed access to justice and venerable principles of federalism.This Article documents the rhetoric-reality gap and explores why it exists and why it matters. [read post]
13 Dec 2022, 9:01 pm
As a technical matter, this provision DOMA amended the federal Full Faith and Credit Act (28 U.S.C. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 9:01 pm
”When he filed a lawsuit in federal court, he alleged sex stereotyping in violation of Title VII and sexual orientation discrimination under New York law, which expressly prohibits the latter type of discrimination. [read post]
23 Dec 2019, 1:19 pm
With a few more days to read the inspector general’s Crossfire Hurricane report and watch the C-SPAN video of his congressional testimony (and listen to the no-bull version on Lawfare), I have five additional observations beyond those set out in a series of tweets on the day the report was released, discussions on the Lawfare podcast the following day, and conversations with NPR, the New York Times, and the Wall Street Journal. [read post]
December 14, 2009 – Environmental Law Settlements, Decisions, Regulatory Actions and Lawsuit Filings
13 Dec 2009, 8:58 pm
— Ross Douthat, The New York Times, December 9, 2009 In his column today, my colleague Thomas Friedman argues eloquently for a Dick Cheney-esque, “one percent doctrine” approach to climate change, which would treat caps on greenhouse emissions as a rational way to “buy insurance” against a potentially catastrophic outcome. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm
– Allison Winter, The New York Times, March 12, 2010 U.S. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 11:41 am
Insurers would be required to pay Appian $500 million if the state supreme court rules that Pegasystems should have won. [read post]
