Search for: "Matter of T S B"
Results 521 - 540
of 19,572
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jan 2022, 9:05 pm
Whether Lapsley is appointed as the court’s expert won’t be known until 10 a.m. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 6:46 am
” Well, unfortunately, that doesn’t matter. [read post]
3 Jul 2010, 2:03 pm
(I think this is wrong, because the extra requirements of §43(a)(1)(B)—competition, materiality, and “advertising or promotion”—address all the Supreme Court’s concerns in Dastar, providing a way to protect consumers when a misrepresentation of origin really would matter to them. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 1:37 am
(See Reasons, point 5.3)(emphasis added)Reasons for the Decision(...)3.4 In view of the above, the opposition division's finding that the subject-matter of claims 1 and 9 of the granted patent lacked novelty over the disclosure of D1 was not correct (Article 100(a) EPC).(...)4.3 In view of the above, the opposition division's finding that the subject-matter of claims 1 and 9 of the granted patent lacked novelty over the disclosure of D4 was not correct… [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 2:18 pm
Back in 2006, ATL named him America's hottest law school dean (male, B-bracket). [read post]
8 May 2014, 7:13 am
For example, there is no reason for Country A or B to think that the scenario in Figure 2 is just fine by reason of, say, the synergy income’s paying, say, a 10 percent rate in Country C. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 6:00 am
Under those circumstances, the court concluded that Section 28(b) provided the basis for an attorney’s fee award. [read post]
2 May 2007, 8:12 pm
Stewart for that matter. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 10:02 pm
(Suggestion (b) above simply borrows from the statute's own statement of policy). [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 4:14 am
The first intervener invoked the grounds for opposition pursuant to Article 100(a), (b) and (c) EPC. [read post]
12 Sep 2024, 8:46 am
Last week, the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA), in Matter of R-T-P- , handed immigration judges the authority to “fix” these defective NTAs instead of requiring DHS to do their job correctly. [read post]
25 Apr 2010, 3:01 pm
Document E1 reveals all the features of claim 1 in accordance with the main request except for claim item (b)(i). [read post]
5 Feb 2012, 5:01 pm
(b) Until 1 May 2003 it also held good for appeal proceedings (point [24] below). [read post]
16 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
Rule 16(b)(4) provides that “[a] schedule may be modified only for good cause and with the judge’s consent. [read post]
19 Oct 2015, 4:00 am
Robert B. [read post]
24 Feb 2016, 7:37 am
As a practical matter, they need to either (a) get the decision reversed, (b) rewrite the regulations, or (c) accept really bad results as par for the course. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:40 pm
I've nevertheless intended to offer a few cents of my own on the matter for a while now, and so, with Neil's blessing, I post on it now. [read post]
22 May 2015, 5:32 am
” Section B (pp. 59-63) is completely redacted, including the section title. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 3:01 pm
” [11] Thus, prima facie and when regarded separately, the meaning of both claims 13 and 14 is clear, i.e. they both relate to the same subject-matter. [12] However, as noted in point [2] above, the meaning of a claims is determined in the context of the whole application, i.e. also in context with other claims. [12.1] When claim 13 is regarded in context with claim 14 an uncertainty about the meaning of claim 13 arises in because claim 14 is dependent on claim 13, yet covers the same… [read post]
7 Sep 2019, 7:04 am
"You're old, so you don't matter — that worked for us Boomers when we were young, but it doesn't work against us now that we're old. [read post]
