Search for: "Mccarthy, in Re" Results 521 - 540 of 1,128
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Feb 2016, 2:38 pm by Emma Durand-Wood
We’re due for another “what’s new at lawblogs.ca” post! [read post]
25 Jan 2016, 10:45 am by Ron Coleman
Right — so long as the trademark in question is THE trademark under which they’re doing business, that is. [read post]
21 Jan 2016, 9:45 pm by RegBlog
WHAT WE’RE READING THIS WEEK The International Monetary Fund (IMF) published a Staff Discussion Note evaluating current regulations of virtual currencies, such as bitcoin. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 5:00 am by Randi Morrison
Re: engagement – who should be involved in the process from a companies point of view? [read post]
15 Jan 2016, 8:00 am
  In 2015 we managed to defeat the vast majority of those bills, and we’re prepared to fight them again. [read post]
11 Jan 2016, 6:25 am by Rebecca Tushnet
 (The court doesn’t address the otherwise outdated/deprecated status of Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders; wonder what effect the analysis in In re Tam would have here?) [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 7:27 am by WIMS
EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy seeking information regarding the use of social media platforms by EPA to promote the agency's climate rules. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 7:13 am by WIMS
EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy seeking information regarding the use of social media platforms by EPA to promote the agency's climate rules. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 8:33 am by WIMS
EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy seeking information regarding the use of social media platforms by EPA to promote the agency's climate rules. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 5:19 am by WIMS
EPA Administrator Gina McCarthy seeking information regarding the use of social media platforms by EPA to promote the agency's climate rules. [read post]
11 Dec 2015, 4:00 am by Cordell Parvin
Second, they need to be bold about re-thinking what they do. [read post]
9 Dec 2015, 8:37 pm by Ron Coleman
Thomas McCarthy, McCarthy on Trademarks & Unfair Competition § 31:14, at 587 (2d ed. 1984))). [read post]
2 Dec 2015, 3:52 am by SHG
  So McCarthy is the first to go, especially since Emmanuel put in so much effort getting re-elected while the video remained concealed that it would be a shame to waste a big election victory. [read post]
24 Nov 2015, 5:56 am by Staci Zaretsky
[WSJ Law Blog] * If you're planning to take the LSAT in December and you still don't have a game plan set out for how you're going to manage your time while taking the test, you may have already screwed yourself. [read post]