Search for: "Merrick v. Merrick" Results 521 - 540 of 677
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2015, 8:07 pm by Stephen Bilkis
A New York Family Lawyer said that on July 1, 2005, after spending several hours in a bar in Manhattan, at which he consumed at least six beers, the defendant attended a friend's party in Merrick in Nassau County. [read post]
24 May 2015, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
Walter Merricks, Chair of IMPRESS, discusses the decision here. [read post]
13 May 2015, 3:00 pm
Other justices and judges involved included Associate Justice Stephen Breyer, Chief Judge Merrick Garland and Judge Patricia Millett of the U.S. [read post]
13 May 2015, 10:46 am by Kali Borkoski
” Justice Garland recalled the Court’s precedent in “NBC v. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 8:07 pm by Michael Froomkin
But as of right they could do one million square feet1, which is comparable to village of Merrick Park. [read post]
6 Oct 2014, 5:43 am
As Justice Holmes stated in Crowley v Pulsifer (137 Mass 392 [1884]): It is desirable that the trial of cases should take place under public eye, not because the controversies of one citizen are of public concern, but because it is of the highest moment that those who administer [read post]
27 Apr 2014, 9:39 am by Howard Friedman
LEXIS 55059 (D CO, April 21, 2014), a Colorado federal district court found no merit in an inmate's challenge to his conviction in a habeas proceeding complaining that his court appointed counsel would only meet with him between Friday sunset and Saturday sunset, the Sabbath for petitioner.In Merrick v. [read post]
15 Jan 2014, 4:53 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Chief Judge Merrick Garland tags himself in, and offers a little more detail on that evidence. [read post]
13 Jan 2014, 8:27 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
Circuit Judges Merrick Garland, Karen LeCraft Henderson, and David Tatel this morning is its second oral argument related to the detention of Afghan detainee Obaydullah. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 6:46 pm by Raffaela Wakeman
 Chief Judge Merrick Garland brings up the case of Johnson v. [read post]