Search for: "Microsoft v. United States"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,345
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Apr 2014, 6:22 am
” Last month, United States District Judge Jesse M. [read post]
17 Apr 2016, 2:17 pm
“Hayuk’s work has been featured widely in popular online and print publications, such as The New York Times (United States), Huffington Post (United States), Juxtapoz Art & Culture Magazine (United States), Hypebeast (Hong Kong), Arrestedmotion (United States), Laughing Squid (United States), Web Urbanist (United States), NYLON Magazine (United States),… [read post]
25 Sep 2013, 8:11 pm
Samsung, Microsoft v. [read post]
24 Mar 2011, 9:43 pm
’ Convergence facts, figures and trends (IPKat) 100 domains on movie and music industry website blocking wishlist (TorrentFreak) Design infringement in the UK: official guidance (Class 99) United States US Patents – Decisions CAFC rejects narrow view of analogous arts test: Innovention Toys vs. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 11:28 am
by Dennis Crouch On Patently-O, our primary focus is patent law, but sometimes we remember that the “Patent Office” is actually the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). [read post]
27 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
v. [read post]
21 May 2010, 10:54 am
The latest statistics from the United States Patent and Trademark Office on ex parte re-examination show that 92% of requests for reexaminations are granted. [read post]
27 Apr 2008, 6:19 am
See United States v. [read post]
18 Apr 2011, 4:00 am
Some of the documents Chevron sought were not located in the United States. [read post]
18 Dec 2024, 9:39 pm
The Internet Archive has said it will not appeal the decision to the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
Copyright in declaring API code: here's why I don't have any competition concerns (Oracle v. Google)
15 May 2015, 7:11 am
There's probably no appeals court in the whole wide world that hears more attempts to monopolize functionality than the Federal Circuit, which hears all patent infringement and validity appeals in the United States. [read post]
29 Jan 2018, 2:29 am
Then on Tuesday, February 27, the Court gets another big case, United States v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 5:20 am
In that connection, I should note the Microsoft case (United States v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 2:13 am
Google described it as a mere clarification, though I would agree with Epic and others that in reality it constituted a policy change, an about-face.By "[f]or the time being" I meant that this is just temporary, like a moratorium:At the very latest, this agreement terminates when the United States District Court for the Northern District of California has entered final judgment in, or otherwise disposed of, Epic Games v. [read post]
5 Aug 2014, 11:54 pm
Apple v. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 3:23 am
They partnered together and sold their software as a single unit. [read post]
16 Oct 2006, 9:44 pm
KSR v. [read post]
9 Oct 2022, 11:11 pm
After the Epic Games v. [read post]
18 Nov 2021, 8:37 pm
Either way, the South Korean bill doesn't help developers or consumers in the slightest as things stand.The South Korean parliament needs to amend its bill or Google will be laughing all the way to the bank.And there's a geopolitical issue here: South Korea is somewhat dependent on the United States (not just for military reasons). [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 5:26 am
" Background United States Patent No. 5,490,216, assigned to Uniloc, relates to "a software registration system to deter copying of software. [read post]
