Search for: "Miller v. Deal" Results 521 - 540 of 1,123
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2020, 3:58 am by Edith Roberts
Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
14 Oct 2014, 5:29 pm by Colin O'Keefe
– Los Angeles attorney David Urban of Liebert Cassidy Whitmore on the firm’s California Public Agency Labor and Employment Blog The effect of government privatization on global M&A – Toronto attorney Sara Josselyn of Norton Rose on the firm’s blog, Deal Law Wire With Hiring On The Rise, Employers Should Review And Update Old Job Applications – Fort Lauderdale attorney Tobi Lebowitz of Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterson on the… [read post]
29 Jan 2015, 3:03 pm by Lyle Denniston
The case tests the potential retroactivity of the Court’s ruling in Miller v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 8:00 am by lawshucks
Among the career highlights noted is his work on Law Shucks favorite, the recent Airgas proxy fight (or as we like to call it, Wachtell v. [read post]
17 Jun 2008, 2:51 am
Miller including an opinion on how convictions on multiple charges constituted double jeopardy. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 8:40 am by Kara OBrien
  They are refreshingly unconventional and sound much more interesting than the standard “how to succeed in business” drivel. 3) DealLawyers: VC Laster Blesses Top-Up Option in Carlisle/Hawk Merger Agreement - Kevin Miller of Alston & Bird, a Practice Center Contributor, discusses VC Laster’s comments last week at PLI’s Securities Regulation Institute regarding the top-up option in merger deals. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 6:11 am
This post focuses on the limitations that the ADA imposes on such testing, and concludes that the Seventh Circuit’s approach to the issue in Karraker v. [read post]
6 Oct 2019, 9:53 am by Samuel Bray
., the declaratory judgment controversy and the legal challenges to the New Deal). [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
The Guardian had a piece “Guardian Australia strikes deal with Facebook to licence news to the platform”. [read post]
30 Sep 2011, 6:28 am by judith
Over the past couple of years, there has been a great deal of discussion — particularly in relation to the Durham Statement [1] — about technical standards and preservation issues for law reviews that publish openly and exclusively online. [read post]