Search for: "Million v. Board of Education"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,000
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2007, 9:54 am
Board of Education" Should Have Said. [read post]
4 Mar 2011, 3:41 pm
The stories of women involved in the case, Dukes v. [read post]
9 Mar 2022, 4:08 pm
V. [read post]
4 Apr 2011, 5:38 pm
Board Certified in Labor & Employment Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, management attorney and consultant Ms. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
The breakdown of the total award was US$2.5 million in compensatory damages and US$5 million in compensatory damages, a sum still some way shy of the US$28 million sought by the Plaintiff. [read post]
23 Feb 2021, 6:58 am
Inc. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 3:52 am
V. [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 4:00 am
Supreme Court overturn Roe v. [read post]
2 May 2016, 2:30 pm
Exponential number may not have been apparent in 1998 when Congress was looking at bulletin boards. [read post]
11 Nov 2022, 7:44 am
Mezey v. [read post]
10 Oct 2017, 2:58 am
… 18 Long v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 10:37 am
ShareIn 1969, the Supreme Court ruled in Tinker v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 9:49 am
Board of Education, the case that led to the Supreme Court decision that outlawed segregation in schools. [read post]
23 Oct 2017, 3:00 am
Deputy Assistant Secretaries of State Patrick Murphy and Marc Storella will testify alongside V. [read post]
8 May 2018, 6:37 am
KIT KAT is back as the Advocate General gives his two fingerstwo centsNestlé v Mondelez v EUIPO Joined Cases C‑84/17 P, C‑85/17 P and C‑95/17 P (April 2018)In Volume II we reported on Nestlé’s loss of its UK shape mark for the four finger Kit Kat chocolate bar. [read post]
27 Jun 2018, 9:14 am
In Abood v. [read post]
12 Sep 2023, 9:15 am
The Third Circuit’s Deliberations The case currently pending before the Third Circuit, Johnson v. [read post]
8 Aug 2012, 8:20 am
Board of Education, Roe v. [read post]
6 Jun 2017, 5:29 pm
Detroit Board of Education. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am
However, the jury determined that the City was "liable for negligence with respect to the incident . . . under a respondeat superior theory" and awarded plaintiff $3 million in damages, with 90% apportioned to the City. [read post]
