Search for: "Mitchell v. People"
Results 521 - 540
of 709
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Mar 2011, 2:08 am
In a letter no doubt inspired by the phraseology of the Court of Justice of the European Union in L'Oréal v Bellure (see post here and earlier posts from the IPKat), the letter from law firm Mishcon de Reya accuses The Icecreamists of "taking unfair advantage of, and riding on the coattails of" Lady Gaga's trade marks in a manner that is "deliberately provocative and, to many people, nausea-inducing". [read post]
26 Feb 2011, 8:23 am
n v. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm
Danner, Duke Law School; Jerry Goldman, Northwestern University; Mitchell Kapor, Mitchell Kapor Foundation; Lawrence Lessig, Harvard Law School; Harry S. [read post]
14 Feb 2011, 12:00 pm
Danner, Duke Law School; Jerry Goldman, Northwestern University; Mitchell Kapor, Mitchell Kapor Foundation; Lawrence Lessig, Harvard Law School; Harry S. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 8:05 pm
Mitchell v. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 3:20 am
Via Adjunct Law Profs, Mitchell H. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:21 pm
Kardesch, but the Supreme Court of Missouri reversed in Mitchell v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 1:06 pm
The circuit court found that the Oklahoma court lacked personal jurisdiction over Frazee, but the Supreme Court of Missouri reversed in People’s Bank v. [read post]
6 Jan 2011, 9:38 am
Sandford, 60 U.S. 393 (1857).The Sixteenth Amendment, on income tax, abrogated Pollock v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:23 am
People v Holmes, 2010 NY Slip Op 9683, 2010 N.Y. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
BLIX STREET RECORDS, INC. v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
BLIX STREET RECORDS, INC. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2010, 2:43 pm
(Houseman v. [read post]
18 Nov 2010, 4:03 am
Bormes v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am
Keynote address: indigenous peoples and global climate change: intercultural models of climate equity. 25 J. [read post]
9 Nov 2010, 6:22 pm
In the case of California v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 3:26 pm
http://www.courts.wa.gov/opinions/pdf/830231.co1.pdf State v. [read post]
31 Oct 2010, 12:30 pm
For example, the intention behind the equal protection clause might be formulated at a relatively high level of generality--leading to the conclusion that segregation is unconstitutional--or at a very particular level--in which case the fact that the Reconstruction Congress segregated the District of Columbia schools might be thought to support the "separate but equal" principle of Plessy v. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 7:45 pm
District Court in California recently addressed the validity of this discovery maneuver in the 2010 case of Crispin v. [read post]
