Search for: "Moore v. Hand" Results 521 - 540 of 780
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Jul 2010, 7:19 am
(IP Dragon)   Europe EU antitrust cops ‘very carefully’ probing Google search (ArsTechnica) Importing non-UK decoders into the EU: a multiplicity of questions: Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) and British Sky Broadcasting Limited v Euroview Sport Ltd (IPKat)   India Intermediary liability for copyright infringement in India: Few thoughts in the wake of Viacom v YouTube Part 1 and 2 (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP)   Netherlands Dutch public broadcaster… [read post]
8 Jul 2010, 6:04 pm by Duncan
(IP Dragon) Europe EU antitrust cops ‘very carefully’ probing Google search (ArsTechnica) Importing non-UK decoders into the EU: a multiplicity of questions: Union of European Football Associations (UEFA) and British Sky Broadcasting Limited v Euroview Sport Ltd (IPKat) India Intermediary liability for copyright infringement in India: Few thoughts in the wake of Viacom v YouTube Part 1 and 2 (Spicy IP) (Spicy IP) Netherlands Dutch public broadcaster launches… [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 11:07 pm
" How did the California court stray so far from the Fourth Amendment's moorings? [read post]
25 Jan 2015, 2:28 am by Ben
  After it was published, Nike's Peter Moore, who designed the first Air Jordans, paid $150 for temporary use of Rentmeester's slides. [read post]
23 Aug 2018, 10:37 pm
[On a side note, comparing this to the Sheeran v Switch case - Switch went for varying degrees of both approaches in that they argued the two had mutual friends and that the 'Oh Why' song was on several platforms, but his YouTube video only has 41,122 views and there's no Grammy nomination...]But back to the matter at hand - having convinced the Court that there was a reasonable possibility that the writers had access to the work, the next question was whether or not… [read post]
24 Aug 2018, 3:22 am by Ben
[On a side note, comparing this to the Sheeran v Switch case - Switch went for varying degrees of both approaches in that they argued the two had mutual friends and that the 'Oh Why' song was on several platforms, but his YouTube video only has 41,122 views and there's no Grammy nomination...]But back to the matter at hand - having convinced the Court that there was a reasonable possibility that the writers had access to the work, the next question was… [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 8:00 pm by Florian Mueller
He expressed great admiration for Apple's contribution to innovation in a 2013 ruling in an Apple v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 7:21 am by RobKornfeld
John Clifford Moore, Attorney at Law, Maple Valley, Robert Craig Levin, Mitchell Lang & Smith, Seattle, for Respondent. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am by James (Jim) P. Flynn
”  New settings for Christmas Savings Clubs faired no better as alleged trade secrets or protectable ideas either, as seen in Moore v. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:47 am by James P. Flynn
”  New settings for Christmas Savings Clubs faired no better as alleged trade secrets or protectable ideas either, as seen in Moore v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 5:07 pm by INFORRM
On Tuesday 21 June 2011, the Court of Appeal (Master of the Rolls, Thomas and Moses LJJ) reserved judgment in the libel appeals by the claimants in the cases of Modi v Clarke and IMG v Clarke against rulings of Mr Justice Tugendhat, handed down on 24 May 2011. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 12:31 am by INFORRM
On the same day Moore-Bick LJ gave the defendant permission to appeal in the case of Bento v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire. [read post]
15 May 2011, 5:04 pm by INFORRM
 We had a post by Martin Moore of the Media Standards Trust. [read post]
7 Nov 2010, 4:03 pm by INFORRM
[Update] Mr Justice Tugendhat handed down judgment in the case of Ifedha v Archant Regional Ltd at 10.30am on 8 November 2010. [read post]
21 Feb 2024, 5:56 am by LII Team
President and Fellows of Harvard College, Moore v. [read post]