Search for: "Moore v. New York" Results 521 - 540 of 717
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Apr 2011, 10:38 am by Andrew Goldberg
Ruling in a case brought by several doctors' groups, the ACLU, and the Public Patent Foundation, New York federal district court Judge Robert Sweet last year struck down Myriad's patents on two genes related to breast cancer, holding that they merely covered isolated DNA from the natural world and thus were not eligible for patent production under section 101 of the Patent Act. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 3:00 am by John Day
“Other jurisdictions, such as New York, hold that misconduct is not to be anticipated in the absence of proof of prior misconduct. [read post]
7 Mar 2011, 6:23 am by James Bickford
”  In the New Jersey Star Ledger, John Farmer compares Justice Alito’s dissent to in Snyder to Justice Robert Jackson’s advocacy of “practical wisdom” his dissent in Terminiello v. [read post]
25 Feb 2011, 5:41 am by Bridget Crawford
February 24, 2011 New York City Bar Association, Office Of The Attorney General, City Of New York, Amici Curiae. [read post]
11 Feb 2011, 7:51 am by Peter Rost
Rost on Leonard Lopate Show, New York Public Radio. [read post]
9 Feb 2011, 10:50 am by NBlack
Rogers then emphasized the importance of being on the cutting edge of new developments in technology, using the New York Time’s adoption of the mobile web as an example. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 6:06 am by Kiran Bhat
The editorial board of the New York Times discusses the recent oral argument in Montana v. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am by Amanda Rice
  The New York Times, SCOTUSblog, USA Today, the WSJ Law Blog, Bloomberg, JURIST, and CNN all have additional coverage of the argument. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 6:34 am by Amanda Rice
  The New York Times, SCOTUSblog, USA Today, the WSJ Law Blog, Bloomberg, JURIST, and CNN all have additional coverage of the argument. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:11 am by Ken Lammers
New York - When police violate the 4th Amendment in order to get pre-existing documents concerning the defendant must the documents be excluded? [read post]