Search for: "Morales v. United States" Results 521 - 540 of 3,614
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Dec 2014, 4:57 am by Amy Howe
United States, the Facebook threats case, continues. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 5:03 am by John Day
The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit has ruled that a trial judge appropriately admitted surveillance videos of the plaintiff into evidence. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:23 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) So the California Supreme Court unanimously held Monday, in Martinez v. [read post]
He stated: Seventy-seven years ago, the Soviet Union demanded and received reparations, calling it a moral right of a country that has suffered war and occupation. [read post]
18 May 2016, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
” This is the turn in religious liberty discourse and doctrine that the United States has needed since RFRA was first passed in 1993. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 5:44 pm by INFORRM
It was also distinguishable from the use of private property for the purposes of collecting signatures for a petition (Appleby v United Kingdom, no. 44306/98, 6 May 2003) or the general prohibition on a ship entering the State’s territorial waters for campaigning purposes (Women on Waves v Portugal, no. 31276/05, 3 February 2009). [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 1:45 pm
Davis' Christian duty is to uphold her oath of office, in which she swore to support and defend both the United States and Kentucky Constitutions. [read post]
11 Apr 2023, 6:18 pm by Elliot Abrams
These petitions to the United States Supreme Court cover a broad range of legal issues related to federal criminal law. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 4:12 am
The United States Constitution was crafted in a remarkable era of politics, philosophy, and deliberative debate. [read post]
18 Apr 2014, 3:24 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In the meantime, on 30 June 2010 the defendant through his newly retained counsel, AF filed a Criminal Procedure Law 440 motion (1) praying the Court for retroactive application to his case of a recent United States Supreme Court's decision in Padilla v. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:47 am by Weisman, Young & Ruemenapp, P.C.
United States that criminal defendants should be allowed to use untainted assets; that is, assets unrelated to their alleged crimes, to pay for their criminal defense. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:47 am by Weisman, Young & Ruemenapp, P.C.
United States that criminal defendants should be allowed to use untainted assets; that is, assets unrelated to their alleged crimes, to pay for their criminal defense. [read post]
24 Mar 2015, 4:05 pm by John Chierichella
United States – calls into serious question the efficacy of NDAs signed by U.S. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 8:47 am by Weisman, Young & Ruemenapp, P.C.
United States that criminal defendants should be allowed to use untainted assets; that is, assets unrelated to their alleged crimes, to pay for their criminal defense. [read post]