Search for: "Motion to Quash Subpoena"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,082
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Aug 2012, 4:40 am
Following the ruling, Twitter filed its own motion to quash the subpoena. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 10:01 am
Does Copyright Doe Defendant Can’t Quash Disclosure Subpoena Anonymously—Hard Drive Productions v. [read post]
1 Aug 2012, 6:51 am
He didn’t care for that: After learning of the subpoenas duces tecum issued to his banks, petitioner filed a motion to dismiss seeking to have his case dismissed without prejudice. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 9:29 am
(b) If the court grants a motion to quash a subpoena issued pursuant to subsection (a), the court may award the party subpoenaed its reasonable attorney's fees and expenses incurred in defending against the subpoena. [read post]
30 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
The defendants moved to quash the subpoena based upon the LLC's assertion of attorney-client privilege. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 12:08 pm
There is a ton of coverage about Motions to Quash the subpoenas that are being served in these mass-infringement cases. [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 6:13 am
Goan – http://bit.ly/OkMJum (Venkat Balasubramani) Factual Material Considered by Expert Is Discoverable Despite Expert Witness Amendments - http://bit.ly/LuCGRb (Gregory Joseph) Failure to Issue a Written Litigation Hold Not Necessarily Fatal - http://bit.ly/LKUv36 (Thomas Tobin) Five Guidelines for Completing the Best Document Review Project – http://bit.ly/PA7xAZ (Jonathan Easton) Google’s Privilege Claim: A Cautionary Tale… [read post]
25 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
The judge granted the ex parte application, and NextEra then moved to quash the subpoena. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 6:25 pm
– Seattle lawyer Elaine Spencer of Graham & Dunn on the firm’s blog, GreenTech We’ve Come for Your Tweets: Twitter to Appeal Denial of Its Motion to Quash District Attorney’s Subpoena – J. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 9:06 am
Shipman & Goodwin, LLP (Legal malpractice; attorney-client privilege; writ of error; discovery; motion to quash subpoena; "The primary issue is whether a nonparty attorney may bring a writ of error from a trial court’s order requiring the attorney to comply with a clear and definite discovery request. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 7:38 am
The court’s decision followed a ruling in April which denied the protestor’s own motion to quash the subpoena on standing grounds. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Husband moved to quash the subpoenas on the grounds that the information sought by Wife was not discoverable because it was protected by the psychologist-client privilege. [read post]
19 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Husband moved to quash the subpoenas on the grounds that the information sought by Wife was not discoverable because it was protected by the psychologist-client privilege. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
First, Malcolm Harris tried to quash a subpoena seeking production of his Tweets and his Twitter account user information in his New York criminal case. [read post]
16 Jul 2012, 1:05 pm
Judge Miller denied the ore tenus motion and reset the case to commence re-trial July 16, 2102. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 1:08 pm
Does 1-5, a BitTorrent download case pending in Manhattan before Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald, John Doe #4 filed his reply memo today, further supporting his motion to quash the subpoena, and to sever and dismiss the claim against him. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 11:44 am
The trial court, in November, upon husband’s motion quashed the bank subpoenas pending its decision on wife’s motions to enforce the contempt order and to reopen the divorce. [read post]
13 Jul 2012, 6:45 am
Harris’ then moved to quash the subpoena, but his motion was denied on the grounds that Twitter owned the data and thus Harris lacked standing to challenge the subpoena. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 8:01 am
In denying the newspaper’s motion to quash the subpoena, the judge also ruled that two other commenters’ identities need not be revealed because their posts were not defamatory. [read post]
12 Jul 2012, 6:34 am
" The post was removed less than three hours after it first appeared.Judge Luster rejected the daily's free speech argument in denying the paper's motion to quash the subpoena seeking identifying information about the unidentified blogger, noting that the First Amendment does not protect defamatory speech. [read post]
