Search for: "N.Y. Supreme Court" Results 521 - 540 of 3,416
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Oct 2021, 11:09 pm by Eugene Volokh
Although defendants claim that they expect the number of people in need of a medical exemption to be low, the Supreme Court has recently emphasized that "[c]omparability is concerned with the risks various activities pose," not the reasons for which they are undertaken. [read post]
12 Oct 2021, 5:27 am by Eugene Volokh
The language of §594.39(c)(1) comes virtually verbatim from a Colorado statute upheld by the Supreme Court in Hill v. [read post]
10 Oct 2021, 7:29 am by Kevin LaCroix
  In March 2021, in a brief three-page opinion (here), the appellate division of the New York Supreme Court affirmed the trial court’s denial of the motion to dismiss, holding that the lower court correctly concluded that the New York state court has jurisdiction over the defendants since the investors had established that the defendants had done business in New York. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am by Public Employment Law Press
Addressing Petitioner's allegations of violation of Civil Service Law §75-b, the Appellate Division sustained Supreme Court's action, explaining that "claims under CSL 75-b are committed to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Claims," citing Article VI, §9 and the Court of Claims Act §§ 8-9. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am by Public Employment Law Press
Addressing Petitioner's allegations of violation of Civil Service Law §75-b, the Appellate Division sustained Supreme Court's action, explaining that "claims under CSL 75-b are committed to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Claims," citing Article VI, §9 and the Court of Claims Act §§ 8-9. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am by Public Employment Law Press
Addressing Petitioner's allegations of violation of Civil Service Law §75-b, the Appellate Division sustained Supreme Court's action, explaining that "claims under CSL 75-b are committed to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Claims," citing Article VI, §9 and the Court of Claims Act §§ 8-9. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am by Public Employment Law Press
Addressing Petitioner's allegations of violation of Civil Service Law §75-b, the Appellate Division sustained Supreme Court's action, explaining that "claims under CSL 75-b are committed to the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court of Claims," citing Article VI, §9 and the Court of Claims Act §§ 8-9. [read post]
4 Oct 2021, 10:58 am by Rebecca Tushnet
For about a decade, courts had realized that IIC had gone way too far, and had expanded liability in ways that didn’t [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am by Joel R. Brandes
Supreme Court subsequently appointed a guardian for plaintiff pursuant Mental Hygiene Law 81. [read post]
21 Sep 2021, 10:09 am by Rebecca Tushnet
The Supreme Court (that is, the appellate court) reasoned that GBL § 349 was inapplicable because the Tanbook wasn’t directed at consumers at large for personal, family, or household use, but rather to legal professionals. [read post]
20 Aug 2021, 12:30 pm by John Ross
Last year, the Supreme Court ruled that there is no possible remedy in an American court for a fatal cross-border shooting, no matter how unreasonable, of a Mexican teen by a U.S. border agent. [read post]
18 Aug 2021, 6:25 pm by Russell Knight
Society of New York Hospital (1914), 211 N.Y. 125, 129-30, 105 N.E. 92, 93. [read post]