Search for: "NEW YORK v. CONNECTICUT"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,721
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2017, 2:56 am
New York (17 Apr 1905) ―Lochner, a baker from New York, was convicted of violating the New York Bakeshop Act, which prohibited bakers from working more than 10 hours a day and 60 hours a week. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 9:09 am
As Illinois and New York federal courts are currently considering challenges to state nuclear subsidiaries based in part on the precedent in Hughes v. [read post]
7 Jul 2017, 5:00 am
Sinclair v. [read post]
6 Jul 2017, 1:42 pm
We submitted it last month to the Northern District of New York as part of a formal proposal to amend that court’s rules. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 9:45 pm
Greater New York Mut. 224 Conn. 313 (1992); Huggins v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:50 am
As a result, such waivers are currently legal in New York, Connecticut and Vermont. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 11:50 am
As a result, such waivers are currently legal in New York, Connecticut and Vermont. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 12:50 pm
As many LHB readers are aware, the Law and Society Association hosts "Collaborative Research Networks" that sponsors panels for its annual meeting. [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 11:46 am
How Aaron Burr changed the Constitution [1] One of the best online introductions to the history behind the Loving case comes from its entry in the Encyclopedia of Virginia, http://www.encyclopediavirginia.org/Loving_v_Virginia_1967 [2] According to a 2013 online exhibit from the Library of Virginia, there are ten states that never had bans on interracial marriage: Alaska, Connecticut, Hawaii, Minnesota, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York,… [read post]
15 Jun 2017, 7:34 am
The two amicus briefs were filed by 17 attorneys general, including New York, Virginia, Maryland, California, Connecticut, Delaware, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, New Mexico, North Carolina, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont, Washington, and the District of Columbia. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 11:05 am
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, which covers Connecticut, New York and Vermont, upheld a National Labor Relations Board (“NLRB”) finding that Whole Foods Market Group, Inc. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm
Supreme Court recently decided Expressions Hair Design v. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:01 am
In rejecting this tort, the court noted that it was joining an emerging majority of state courts to have considered the issue, including those in Connecticut, Massachusetts, Hawaii, Iowa, Pennsylvania, New York, and Tennessee. [read post]
30 May 2017, 6:09 am
" I don't think such a procedure exists in New York criminal law, but in Connecticut, a nolle prosequi is not an outright dismissal with prejudice. [read post]
30 May 2017, 5:49 am
In rejecting it, we join an emerging majority of state courts that have considered the issue, including those in Connecticut, Massachusetts, Hawaii, Tennessee, Iowa, Pennsylvania, and New York. [read post]
26 May 2017, 4:17 am
“Saying It’s So, Doesn’t Make It So”—Independent Contractor v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 4:17 am
“Saying It’s So, Doesn’t Make It So”—Independent Contractor v. [read post]
26 May 2017, 3:27 am
(Claims under New York State law went to a jury, and the employer won.) [read post]
25 May 2017, 5:00 am
In ‘89, as a 1L, you signed up for an internship with a new offshoot of the then twelve-year-old D.C. think tank, the Cato Institute. [read post]
22 May 2017, 8:16 am
On May 18, Democratic Attorney Generals from the states of California, New York, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, New Mexico, Pennsylvania, Vermont, and Washington, and the District of Columbia filed a motion to intervene in U.S. [read post]