Search for: "Nixon v. Nixon"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,572
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2019, 3:57 am
At the Nixon Foundation blog, Jeffrey Morris notes that next week marks the 50th anniversary of President Richard Nixon’s appointment of Chief Justice Warren Burger, and he assesses Burger’s legacy. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 7:26 am
Johnson and United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2019, 1:00 pm
Republicans like to blame the Warren Court for everything they don’t like but it was the Burger Court, with four Nixon appointees, that decided Roe v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 2:11 pm
Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes noted in Biddle v. [read post]
9 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
But I continue to believe that the 1968 and 1992 elections, to mention only two especially significant post-World War II elections (and not, for example, the 1912 or 1860 elections), present their own problems inasmuch as the two winners, Richard Nixon and Bill Clinton, had the demonstrated support of only 43% of the population, and, of course, were faced as well by a “divided” Congress in which at least one house was controlled by the opposition party. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm
We asked the 2018-19 Davis Fellows the following question: how has your time at the Davis Center led to new insights about the reach and limits of law and legalities? [read post]
3 Jun 2019, 1:19 pm
American Institute for International Steel v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
And if he is subpoenaed to testify before Congress, a strong argument can be made that he can, and should, say more.A 2000 DOJ Opinion, on which I worked while I was a deputy in the Office of Legal Counsel, reaffirmed a Watergate-era DOJ determination that criminally prosecuting a sitting President would violate the constitutional principle of separation of powers, even after the Supreme Court decided in Clinton v. [read post]
2 Jun 2019, 7:44 am
" Nixon, 418 U.S. at 693. [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 7:36 am
And that Constitution does not authorize impeachment for anything short of high crimes and misdemeanors.Here's the case he's talking about Nixon v. [read post]
1 Jun 2019, 1:01 am
Near v. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
Apart from his ACA decisions, in his dissent in Obergefell v. [read post]
25 May 2019, 7:48 am
Seventy-seven years later, the Court in Watkins v. [read post]
25 May 2019, 7:19 am
Nixon. [read post]
24 May 2019, 3:59 am
Nixon. [read post]
23 May 2019, 7:08 am
I argued earlier this month that Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s report misapplied the presidential clear statement rule and improperly exposed many of President Trump’s actions in response to the Russia investigation to potential criminal liability. [read post]
21 May 2019, 10:57 am
The resolutions authorizing both the Nixon and Clinton impeachment proceedings granted the judiciary committee this authority. [read post]
21 May 2019, 3:56 am
” He referred to the Watergate investigation of President Richard Nixon and the Whitewater investigation of President Bill Clinton. [read post]
17 May 2019, 11:41 am
Nor did Franklin v. [read post]
14 May 2019, 9:01 pm
The 4-1 ruling in Chisolm v. [read post]
