Search for: "OXLEY v. STATE"
Results 521 - 540
of 651
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2013, 6:23 am
The case was AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 8:16 am
This proposed rule follows the 2018 case Digital Realty v. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 11:13 am
See, Beck v. [read post]
16 Nov 2007, 4:21 pm
[3] Complaint at 29-30, New York v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 9:34 am
The case was scheduled to go to trial in New Jersey state court in January. [read post]
28 Mar 2017, 4:32 pm
In response to these stories as well as subsequent media reports, the company issued statements denying the news reports and stating that all Eletrobras units and employees respect the principles in the company’s code of ethics. [read post]
24 Aug 2009, 7:01 am
– unusually entertaining cases before the CAFC: Cornish v Doll (Patently-O) The Independent Inventor’s Handbook (IP Watchdog) US Patents – Decisions CAFC affirms that patent ownership (and standing) can vest through operation of law: Sky Technologies v SAP AG (Peter Zura's 271 Patent Blog) (Patently-O) (Property, intangible) CAFC en banc: Methods do not have exportable components and therefore method claims cannot be infringed under… [read post]
19 Dec 2019, 6:20 am
The justices are scheduled to hear oral argument in Liu’s case on March 3, 2020 (Liu v. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 9:00 am
Now the Boeing Company has filed their brief arguing that media disclosures can never be protected under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 7:30 am
Burwell v. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:17 pm
Data Privacy and Data Protection On 26 May 2021 the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in R (Open Rights Group) v Secretary of State for Home Department [2021] EWCA Civ 800. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 11:49 am
He further ordered the prosecutors to review those memoranda and promptly turn over to the defense any material under Brady v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 5:00 am
If the activity is akin to whistle-blowing, then the activity could be protected under Sarbanes-Oxley or state statute. [read post]
6 May 2010, 5:00 am
If the activity is akin to whistle-blowing, then the activity could be protected under Sarbanes-Oxley or state statute. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 11:40 am
READ PARTS I-V (pp. 101-138 in SSRN version). [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 1:08 am
Supreme Court’s decision in the Morrison v. [read post]
14 Nov 2017, 7:48 am
In 1993, in Conroy v. [read post]
27 Jun 2010, 3:53 am
The first opinion that could emerge is a historic ruling on gun rights, resolving whether the Second Amendment restricts the gun-control powers of states, counties, and cities, and not just the federal government’s powers (McDonald v. [read post]
31 Jul 2019, 7:46 am
See, e.g., Bell v. [read post]
1 Apr 2011, 8:27 am
The case is Carri Johnson v. [read post]
