Search for: "Officer Grant Smith" Results 521 - 540 of 2,979
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jul 2021, 3:57 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Thereafter, the plaintiff commenced this action in the Supreme Court, Queens County, against, among others, the defendant Qiana Smith-Williams (hereinafter the defendant), an attorney for the New York City Law Department who represented the City defendants in the federal action. [read post]
13 Jul 2021, 9:17 am by Patricia Hughes
The case was about a Black youth accused of assaulting a police officer. [read post]
4 Jul 2021, 9:05 pm by Dan Flynn
They are both officers with the FSIS Office of Investigation, Enforcement, and Audit (OIEA). [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 12:57 pm by John Elwood
The solicitor general recommends the court grant review. [read post]
24 Jun 2021, 11:58 am by George Quillin and Jeanne Gills
A decade ago, Congress enacted a patent-reform bill, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act. [read post]
17 Jun 2021, 9:01 pm by Leslie C. Griffin
Kennedy ran for the office in 1960. [read post]
14 Jun 2021, 9:35 am
Circuit Executives Celebrate 50th Anniversary of Office - Part II recounts some tales of the 9th Circuit:Cathy Catterson grew professionally as the circuit executive office matured. [read post]
13 Jun 2021, 5:18 pm
Beck of the Philadelphia law office of the Reed Smith law firm for bringing this case to my attention. [read post]
9 Jun 2021, 7:25 pm by Jon L. Gelman
A different motion judge granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment.The Appellate Division reversed the grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendants. 459 N.J. [read post]
7 Jun 2021, 9:23 am by Brittany Williams
Finally, the Court rejected the argument that existing federal statutes granting tribes limited authority to enforce federal law divested tribes of this sovereign authority. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 4:37 pm by Nicholas Gebelt
Pa. 1999) (a Chapter 7 petition may be dismissed under § 707(a) for lack of good faith in filing the petition); In re Smith, 229 B.R. 895, 897 (Bankr. [read post]