Search for: "Owens v. State"
Results 521 - 540
of 1,148
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Dec 2014, 6:24 am
Since the argument in Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 6:00 am
Owens, in which it held that a notice of removal requires only a plausible allegation that the amount in controversy exceeds the state court’s jurisdictional threshold, garnered the most commentary. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 6:15 pm
In Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 2:24 pm
Owens, No. 13-719 (U.S. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 9:07 am
This morning the United States Supreme Court decided Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. [read post]
15 Dec 2014, 7:25 am
* Oracle v Google: are certain elements of the Java platform entitled to copyright protection? [read post]
8 Dec 2014, 8:42 am
Kenneth continued the "Trademarks and Designs" overlap by giving an explanation of trade dress and product configuration in the United States. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 5:18 am
Owens, 292 Ga. 380, 738 S.E.2d 56 (Georgia Supreme Court 2013).Warren v. [read post]
29 Nov 2014, 11:10 am
(One for each dollar of his special assessment, on the sole reversed count).United States v. [read post]
23 Nov 2014, 12:00 am
Uber’s own drivers have brought a class action in a case called Yucesoy v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 1:07 pm
United States v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
” Owen v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 5:00 am
” Owen v. [read post]
10 Nov 2014, 3:52 am
As the Virginia Supreme Court reasoned in Owens v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
By our count, federal judges have trampled over state sovereignty with respect to the heeding presumption in no fewer than eleven states – Alaska, Colorado (despite contrary state-court authority), Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Kentucky, Maine, New York (despite contrary state-court authority), South Dakota, and Wyoming.Finally, because various states have taken quite different approaches to whether a heeding presumption exists at all and… [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 11:00 pm
The English High Court has recently rendered an insightful and thought provoking decision on the application of Art. 4 II and III of the Rome II Regulation (Winrow v. [read post]
31 Oct 2014, 8:46 am
Next, the majority examined the Eighth Circuit’s decision in Owen v. [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 10:39 am
Owens? [read post]
22 Oct 2014, 4:37 am
Briefly: At the WLF Legal Pulse, Richard Samp urges the Court to rule on the merits of Dart Cherokee Basin Operating Co. v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 7:23 am
At Hamilton and Griffin on Rights, Marci Hamilton looks at the possibility that state legislators can nullify the effect of last Term’s decision in Burwell v. [read post]